Tucker Carlson host warns anyone can be considered a 'domestic extremist.' #FoxNews #Tucker
Sunday, February 07, 2021
Saturday, February 06, 2021
Texas AG: Biden Violated Federal Law with This Executive Order
By Beth Baumann | Townhall.com
Source: AP Photo/Tony Gutierrez, File
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) on Friday filed a lawsuit against the Biden administration for
one of the president's first executive orders, which halts all deportations
of illegal aliens during his first 100 days in office. According to Paxton, the
freeze violates the Constitution and is a violation of federal immigration and
administrative law as well as an agreement between the State of Texas and the
Department of Homeland Security.
“In one of its first of dozens of steps that harm Texas
and the nation as a whole, the Biden administration directed DHS to violate
federal immigration law and breach an agreement to consult and cooperate with
Texas on that law. Our state defends the largest section of the southern border
in the nation. Failure to properly enforce the law will directly and
immediately endanger our citizens and law enforcement personnel,” the attorney
general said in a statement. “DHS itself has previously acknowledged that
such a freeze on deportations will cause concrete injuries to Texas. I am
confident that these unlawful and perilous actions cannot stand. The rule of
law and security of our citizens must prevail.”
According to the lawsuit, the halt on deportations could
create a bigger issue, with DHS deciding to extend the halt, which Paxton says
would "effectively grant a blanket amnesty to illegal aliens that Congress
has refused to pass time and time again."
The deportation halt ignores the recent agreement Texas
and DHS finalized earlier this month that would require the federal agency to
provide the state with 180-days notice before making any changes to immigration
and enforcement policies and practices.
Biden's immigration halt has already drawn an increase in
illegal border crossings. Caravans are starting up again in Central America. One illegal
alien even admitted that Biden gave them 100 days to get into the
United States.
Friday, February 05, 2021
Time Publishes an Astonishing Story About a 'Cabal' and 'Shadow Campaign' That Helped Biden Win
BY STACEY LENNOX | P J Media
AP Photo/Patrick Semansky, Pool
Time published a story that
provides absolutely astonishing details and framing of activities that took
place around the 2020 election. As readers, you deserve a detailed
analysis of this story and the people and organizations involved. The recounting
of the story in Time is longer than a chapter in many
novels. Time says additional details will be provided in a
series of articles over the next several days. This article is an introduction.
The title is provocative enough. “The
Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election.” The
story goes on to describe in precise detail a coalition of various powerful
special interest groups that united, beginning a year before the election, to
ensure Joe Biden would win.
Time begins by describing
the trepidation that surrounded the 2020 election after a summer filled with
left-wing violence and the concern that more violence would follow the election
outcome. The article then quotes President Trump on December 2nd when the
chorus calling on him to concede reached a fever pitch, even among his
supporters:
To
the President, something felt amiss. “It was all very, very strange,” Trump
said on Dec. 2. “Within days after the election, we witnessed an orchestrated
effort to anoint the winner, even while many key states were still being
counted.”
In a
way, Trump was right.
Excuse me? Just wait, Time explains:
There
was a conspiracy unfolding behind the scenes, one that both curtailed the
protests and coordinated the resistance from CEOs. Both surprises were the
result of an informal alliance between left-wing activists and business titans.
The pact was formalized in a terse, little-noticed joint statement of the U.S.
Chamber of Commerce and AFL-CIO published on Election Day. Both sides would
come to see it as a sort of implicit bargain–inspired by the summer’s massive,
sometimes destructive racial-justice protests–in which the forces of labor came
together with the forces of capital to keep the peace and oppose Trump’s
assault on democracy.
This “implicit bargain” is just one part of what the
author refers to as “an extraordinary shadow effort.” An effort aimed at what,
you ask? Time says it was to preserve a free, fair, credible,
and uncorrupted election. Understanding the tactics these groups employed, it
would make sense if you felt like you were being told not to believe what you
saw with your own eyes for much of November and December:
Their
work touched every aspect of the election. They got states to change voting
systems and laws and helped secure hundreds of millions in public and private
funding. They fended off voter-suppression lawsuits, recruited armies of poll
workers and got millions of people to vote by mail for the first time. They
successfully pressured social media companies to take a harder line against
disinformation and used data-driven strategies to fight viral smears. They
executed national public-awareness campaigns that helped Americans understand
how the vote count would unfold over days or weeks, preventing Trump’s
conspiracy theories and false claims of victory from getting more traction.
After Election Day, they monitored every pressure point to ensure that Trump
could not overturn the result. “The untold story of the election is the
thousands of people of both parties who accomplished the triumph of American
democracy at its very foundation,” says Norm Eisen, a prominent lawyer and
former Obama Administration official who recruited Republicans and Democrats to
the board of the Voter Protection Program.
Then Time tells you how you are supposed
to feel after reading the entire story. The bluntness of it, telling readers
that they know how it sounds but they must interpret it differently, is gobsmacking
arrogance:
That’s
why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even
though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream–a well-funded cabal of powerful
people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the
scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage
and control the flow of information. They were not rigging the election; they
were fortifying it. And they believe the public needs to understand the
system’s fragility in order to ensure that democracy in America endures.
What is described in the entire story has nothing to do
with democracy or the consent of the governed. Instead, it represents a bargain
between unions, corporations, activist groups, and the political elite. It is a
precursor to the triumvirate of unions, big business, and the government
becoming more evident every day. Put another way, the political elite, the very
wealthy, the bureaucracy, and those willing to subsidize struck a bargain.
President Franklin D. Roosevelt was the first to attempt
a formal version of this type of cooperation. Roosevelt established the National Recovery Administration (NRA) in 1933. Encoded
into law, it implemented a series of regulations and codes that benefitted
large corporations and labor unions. Companies that complied with codes were
allowed to display a blue eagle emblem to confirm their compliance. In 1935 the
Supreme Court ruled the NRA unconstitutional.
This time, there will be no such official agency or law
establishing a public-private partnership. Instead, it is being coordinated
through the “all of government approach” to climate change outlined in one
of President Biden’s executive orders, our reentry into
the Paris Climate Accords, and Special Envoy for Climate John Kerry’s
participation in the Great Reset at the World Economic Forum.
Kerry explains how world governments will provide a
framework to address climate change. Kerry says private industry has a historic
opportunity to access a global market of four to five billion people in 190
countries, all moving in the same direction on climate through the Paris
Accords. He continued:
And
the private sector now is really beginning to see this. Bjorn, yours was the
stage where the letter from Larry Fink at BlackRock came out and it put
squarely in front of a lot of these CEO’s the issue of stakeholder versus
shareholder.
BlackRock is a global financial investment company
with assets under management of nearly $8 trillion in 2019.
If BlackRock were a country, it would have the third-largest economy globally, behind the U.S. and China.
The letter from Chairman and CEO Larry Fink explained how BlackRock would begin
to consider climate risk in its investment portfolio. It outlined complex reporting requirements around climate
change, equity, and social issues that only the largest organizations will be
able to produce.
Together, large organizations and the government will
push these requirements for government contractors and vendors in private
industry. Coca Cola is one example of this phenomenon. They recently issued diversity hiring quotas that their outside
counsel must meet or receive 30% less in reimbursement. From the letter sent to
their legal firms:
“We
will no longer celebrate good intentions or highly unproductive efforts that
haven’t and aren’t likely to produce better diverse staffing,” General Counsel
Bradley Gayton wrote. “It’s the results that we are demanding and will measure
going forward.”
This summary is a 10,000-foot view of the big picture
that would incentivize the Time story’s varied interests to
cooperate. Labor unions, business titans, and left-wing activists all
collaborated to influence 2020 in the direction of the administration that
embraces global governance organizations, international treaties, and social
justice issues. The reward is power and money, two of the greatest motivators
of all, brought in under the guise of saving the planet.
Thursday, February 04, 2021
Republicans Should be Cheerfully Optimistic
By Newt Gingrich
From trying to impeach President Donald Trump (who is now
a private citizen), to focusing on Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, to maximizing
the divide between Rep. Liz Cheney and Trump supporters, the propaganda media
and the Democrats are maneuvering to try to create a defensive Republican
Party. They want to keep the GOP crouched in a circular firing squad shooting
at itself.
This is because the Democrats have real imperatives
driving them to harass and attack Republicans.
First, anti-Trump and anti-Republican rhetoric is the
only thing unifying an otherwise shaky coalition on the Left. The longer they
can keep making noise about Trump and Republicans, the more time they have to
sign executive orders and change America through regulations without anyone
noticing.
Second, the more they can focus the media on the
Republicans, the less the media will cover the radical, corrupt, and job-killing
actions and foreign policy blunders of the Biden Democratic Party.
Forget about the $600 million in cyber theft that Washington state
Employment Security Department Commissioner Suzi LeVine presided over before
being picked by President Biden for a leadership post in the Labor Department.
Forget the $11.4 billion to $31 billion in California
unemployment insurance fraud in 2020.
Forget Gov. Andrew Cuomo mismanaging COVID-19 so badly
that nine top public health officials have resigned. Cuomo’s failures are so big, and the
unnecessary deaths are so great, even The New York Times is beginning
to cover the Democratic governor’s disaster.
Forget Gov. Gavin Newsom mismanaging California so badly
there is a petition drive underway to force a recall election. This is the
disaster being ignored when Democrats say they want to “make America California
again.”
Forget the radical House rules, which 207 Democrats voted
for, to take mother, father, brother, sister, and other gender-specific words
out of the House’s official rules document (imagine trying to explain that vote
in most of America).
Forget President Biden’s executive order waiving Title IX
for transgender males who want to compete as women – even if they have not
undergone any biological changes. To the propaganda media, the collapse of
competitive women’s sports is not a big enough issue to cover.
Finally, forget Frank Biden’s ad touting his close ties to his brother
that was published by a Miami law firm on Inauguration Day. And forget the number
of lawyers Hunter Biden has now hired to defend himself against a range of
charges involving business dealings with China, Russia, and Ukraine – which the
Left and the propaganda media insisted didn’t exist prior to the election.
The list could go on, but you get the picture.
The Democrats must stay on offense because they will be
crushed once the American people see what they have actually been doing. The
2022 election could potentially become a nightmare for House and Senate
Democrats. Remember: In 1994, House Democrats lost 54 seats and control for the
first time in 40 years. In 2010, Democrats lost 63 seats and control. By every
historic standard, the Democrats’ narrow five-vote majority should disappear in
2022 and Kevin McCarthy should become Speaker of the House.
Republicans have every reason to be optimistic.
Today, there are 27 Republican governors. In 23 states,
Republicans control the legislature as well as the governorship.
There are 4,007 Republican state legislators to 3,312 Democratic
state legislators (with Republicans on the rise). The state legislator
advantage means Republicans will draw the lines for reapportionment for about
four times as many House seats as the Democrats. This further increases
Republican opportunities in 2022.
Despite every effort of the Left to arouse (or
manufacture) a civil war in the GOP, the party will remain largely unified and
focused on creating more jobs, lowering taxes, increasing take home pay,
defending America’s interests around the world – and developing solutions in
health, learning, space, and other areas that matter to our future.
Ultimately, the Republican Party of entrepreneurship and
hard work will defeat the Democratic Party of unemployment and redistribution.
Jobs and education will lead to continued Republican
support in minority communities. The diverse House freshmen class (the most
diverse GOP freshman class in history) and President Trump’s achievement in
getting the most minority votes of any Republican presidential candidate in 60
years bode well for a continued growth for a party of prosperity and
opportunity.
The Left is desperate to create a pro-Trump vs.
anti-Trump civil war in the GOP. It will not happen. President Trump is by far
the best known and most liked Republican. But the Republican Party is much
bigger than any one person.
When you look at the achievements of Gov. Ron DeSantis in
Florida and Gov. Greg Abbott in Texas, you can see a clear, successful future
for the GOP.
We are never going to be an anti-Trump party. We are also
never going to be a Trump-only party. Unlike modern Democrats, we welcome a
diversity of opinions.
Think of our future as a Trump-plus Republican party.
The former president will play a major role, but there
will be a lot of smart, creative people adding their ideas and proving their
capabilities. Our bench is immensely deeper than the Democrats’.
When you look at these long-term realities, it is clear
Republicans should be optimists and let the Democrats have the monopoly on
bitterness, hostility, and negativity.
When you see a Democrat, smile at them. It will drive
them nuts. You are going to win, and they are once again going to sink into
despair and defeatism.
Wednesday, February 03, 2021
As All Complain, Gov. DeSantis Acts
Great work Governor!
As many politicians & candidates complain about Social Media Censorship, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has stepped up and presented a bold plan to tackle this big issue.
The DeSantis Social Media Censorship Crackdown Plan
includes the following actions:
• Mandatory
opt-outs from big tech’s content filters.
• A private
right of action for Floridian citizens against tech companies that violate this
condition.
• Fines of
$100,000 per day levied on tech companies that suspend candidates for elected
office in Florida from their platforms.
• Daily fines
for any tech company “that uses their content and user-related algorithms to
suppress or prioritize the access of any content related to a political
candidate or cause on the ballot.”
• Greater
transparency requirements.
• Disclosure
requirements enforced by Florida’s election authorities for tech companies that
favor one candidate over another.
• Power for
the Florida attorney general to bring cases against tech companies that violate
these conditions under the state’s Unfair and Deceptive Practices Act.
Tuesday, February 02, 2021
EXPLOSIVE Study: Media Suppression of 8 Key Stories 'Stole This Election' for Joe Biden
BY TYLER O'NEIL | P J Media
AP Photo/Andrew Harnik
According to an explosive new study the Media Research Center (MRC)
released on Tuesday, the legacy media’s suppression of eight key
election-related news stories effectively handed the presidential election to
Democrat Joe Biden. According to a poll conducted by The Polling Company on behalf
of MRC, a whopping 17 percent of Americans who voted for Joe Biden would not
have done so had they been aware of just one of these stories.
Had the legacy media not buried these stories, Trump
would have won 311 electoral votes, the study claims.
“The national news media stole this election, as far as
I’m concerned, they deliberately stole it from President Trump,” MRC President
Brent Bozell said in a call with reporters. “It is absolutely unequivocal” that
the biased media coverage “cost Donald Trump the election.”
FreedomWorks President Adam Brandon called the 2020
campaign an “issueless conversation,” noting that “without talking about
issues, it basically ended up being a referendum on the president’s
personality.”
Brandon said America is a center-right country, but the
legacy media suppressed the key issues, subverting the substantive issues that
should have decided the 2020 election.
The Polling Company surveyed 1,750 Biden voters in seven swing states: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Six of these states (all except North Carolina) have been called for Biden. The poll found that a whopping 82 percent of Biden voters were unaware of at least one of the news stories, while only five percent said they did not know about all eight.
Media
Research Center survey screenshot.
One out of every six Biden voters (17 percent) said they
would not have voted for the Democrat had they known the facts about one or
more of these news stories.
The poll raised these eight news stories: Tara Reade’s sexual assault allegations against Joe
Biden; Joe Biden’s involvement in the Hunter Biden corruption scandal; Sen. Kamala Harris
(D-Calif.) getting rated the most leftist senator; 33 percent GDP growth in the
third quarter of 2020; 11.1 million jobs created from June 5 to October 2;
the Middle East peace deals with Israel that led to three Nobel Peace Prize nominations for Trump; U.S.
energy independence; and Trump’s successes with Operation Warp Speed in
fighting the Wuhan coronavirus pandemic.
The legacy media’s decision to bury Biden’s scandals had
the strongest impact on the election, according to the poll. More than
one-third of Biden voters (35.4 percent) said they were unaware of Tara Reade’s
serious allegations that Biden sexually assaulted her in the 1990s, a story the
legacy media effectively buried. A full 8.9 percent of Biden voters said
they would have changed their vote — either to Trump, to a third-party
candidate, not voting for a presidential candidate, or not voting at all, if
they had known about the Reade allegations.
According to MRC, this would have flipped six states —
Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin — giving Trump
311 electoral votes.
Nearly half of Biden voters (45.1 percent) said they did
not know about the financial scandal involving Biden and his son Hunter, which
Twitter, Facebook, and the legacy media suppressed or ignored. According to
MRC, full awareness of the scandal would have led 9.4 percent of Biden voters
to abandon the Democrat, flipping all six of the states to Trump.
The legacy media also largely ignored the GovTrack analysis finding that Kamala Harris had the
most left-wing record of any senator in 2019 — even further left than
self-described Democratic Socialist Bernie Sanders. A quarter of Biden voters
(25.3 percent) said they did not know about Harris’ record. A critical 4.1
percent said they would have changed their vote had they known. This proportion
would have flipped Arizona, Georgia, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin to
Trump, giving Trump 295 electoral votes.
MRC also found that legacy media suppression of positive
Trump stories impacted the results.
The five pre-election jobs reports from June 5 to October
2 showed that the economy created a record 11,161,000
jobs in a snapback from the pandemic recession. Yet 39.4 percent of
Biden voters said they did not know about this achievement. Knowledge of this
issue would have led 5.4 percent of them to change their votes, swinging
Arizona, Georgia, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin to Trump, according to
MRC.
On October 29, the government reported that the GDP had
grown by an impressive 33.1 percent, double the previous record. Yet almost half of Biden voters
(49.0 percent) said they did not know about this achievement. Had they known,
5.6 percent said they would have changed their vote, giving Trump 295 electoral
votes.
Similarly, the legacy media effectively buried the impressive and
historic peace agreements between Israel and Arab Muslim countries. These
achievements gained Trump three Nobel Prize nominations. Yet 43.5 percent of
Biden voters had no idea about these agreements. Five percent of Biden voters
said they would have changed their votes had they known, giving Trump 295
electoral votes.
Under President Trump, America achieved energy independence, thanks in part to Trump’s action on
long-stalled pipeline projects and expansion of drilling. America became a net
exporter of oil for the first time in September 2019. Yet more than half (50.5
percent) of Biden voters said they did not know about this and 5.8 percent of
Biden voters said they would have changed their votes had they known. This
would have resulted in the 295-electoral vote win for Trump.
Finally, while the legacy media obsessively covered
COVID-19, it effectively buried the positive news about Trump’s
achievements with Operation Warp Speed, which was well on track to deliver 300
million doses of a safe vaccine as soon as next year.
A full 36.1 percent of Biden voters said they did not
know about the success of Operation Warp Speed, and 5.3 percent said that if
they had, they would have abandoned Biden. This alone would have given Trump
295 electoral votes.
Overall, a total of 17 percent of Biden voters said they
would have changed their votes had they known about one or more of the
important stories. This would have given Trump 311 electoral votes.
The results in specific states also proved remarkable. In
Pennsylvania, 15 percent of Biden voters said they would have defected. In
Michigan, 14 percent said so. In Georgia, 15 percent of Biden’s voters would
have changed their votes. Another 21 percent of Biden voters in Arizona said
so. Another 13 percent of Wisconsin voters would have abandoned Biden while 18
percent of Nevada Biden voters said they would have switched their votes.
Media Research Center survey screenshot.
“The most basic principle of our electoral system is that
our leaders are chosen by the people themselves. But if the people are given
systematically one-sided information, with crucial facts omitted, then the real
power to choose has been stolen from them,” the MRC report argued.
_____________
Tyler O’Neil is the author of Making Hate Pay: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center.
________________
RELATED
ARTICLES
Revolving
Door: Obama Staffers Who Joined NBC, MSNBC, and CNN, Now Headed to Biden Admin
CBS
News Buries Joe Biden Sex Scandal by Airing Tara Reade Interview in AUSTRALIA
Report:
Big Tech, Media ‘Stole the Election’ by Burying Biden-China Scandal
Evidence
of Joe Biden Corruption Just Keeps Piling Up, and the Media Refuses to Cover It
Liberal
Reporter Exposes How the Media Uses ‘White Supremacists’ to ‘Manufacture
Hysteria’
Saudi
Arabia Nearing Historic Deal With Israel — But Biden Could Derail It
Monday, February 01, 2021
A Tsunami of Hate
By John Hinderaker | POWERLINE
Everybody agrees that our country is in crisis – and
agrees that it is the worst crisis since the Civil War. But at the same time,
we tell ourselves a comforting tale about the source of the crisis that
perpetuates the problem instead of providing a path to ending it. We say our
politics are “divisive” and talk about “unity and healing” as though that would
miraculously be achieved if everybody stopped … what? Disagreeing? All politics
is divisive. That’s the healthy basis of our constitutional order: the freedom
to disagree. To suppress disagreement, to outlaw it – as many Democrats and
their Big Tech and media allies – are demanding these days, is to end democracy
as we know it.
The problem is not that we disagree. We are not suffering
as a nation from healthy disagreement. We are suffering from a Tsunami of Hate
emanating from the Democrat Party that seeks to demonize, criminalize and
extinguish dissent from the 75 million supporters of Donald Trump. It is now
official Washington dogma that to question an election result – something the
congressional Democrats have done in the face of every Republican presidential
victory since 2000 – is now “insurrection” and “domestic terrorism,” or the
incitement thereto, and needs to be prosecuted and suppressed.
You can’t have a democracy if this is the attitude of a
party that controls all three branches of government, is enabled by a corrupt
and compliant media, and is determined not just to defeat, but to humiliate,
destroy and expunge from the record an ex-president who is supported by a
greater segment of the American electorate than any American leader before him.
There is Democrat-sponsored legislation pending that
would prevent any public building or artifact, even a “bench” from being named
after the 45th president of the United States. There is a farcical witch-trial
to impeach the same villain even though he has left office and is now a private
citizen. There is even Democrat talk of stripping Trump of his pension, despite
the fact that he gave his entire $1.6 million salary as president to the
American people – something no president before him has done. If ever there was
a public lynching, short of stringing the victim from the nearest tree – and
there are no lack of leftwing calls for that – the Democrats’ unrelentingly
vindictive assault on the defeated Donald Trump down to the last petty detail
is it.
But what is in effect a total war is not merely a war to cancel Donald Trump. If it were, it would be reprehensible enough, but not a threat to the nation itself.
This demonic hate directed by the Democrat Party towards Trump is also hate for the 75 million Americans who voted for him. And there is no shortage of reminders of that. Ordinary Americans in all walks of life who happen to think that Trump’s presidency – which included record employment and record economic growth, delivered benefits for all Americans, particularly American minorities, secured America’s borders, defeated America’s terrorist enemies and led to an unprecedented reconciliation between Arab nations and the State of Israel – Americans who think this is a worthy achievement are treated as social pariahs, have their careers destroyed and (shades of the Kremlin) are regarded as mentally unfit and in need of deprogramming.
In a March 2020 interview with Axios James Clyburn – the
third ranking Democrat in the House and the political figure most responsible
for Biden’s primary victory – raised the specter of Hitler when speaking about
Trump, calling the president a racist and likening modern-day America to
Germany during the Nazi Party’s rise to power. “I used to wonder how could the
people of Germany allow Hitler to exist,” said Clyburn. “But with each passing
day, I’m beginning to understand how. And that’s why I’m trying to sound the
alarm.”
A Tsunami of Hate – not “divisiveness” – is the root
cause of our political crisis and the most existential threat we have faced
since the war to end slavery.
The fact that the threat posed by the Democrats’ Tsunami
of Hate is not just to Trump and his supporters, but to America itself, was
evident in one of Biden’s first directives as president, declaring that a war
on America’s “systemic racism” would be a priority of his administration: “The
fact is systemic racism touches every facet of American life.”
This is one of the Big Lies that have become articles of
faith for Democrats, and is easily refuted. The 1964 Civil Rights Act outlawed
“systemic racism.” Here is the Wikipedia description of the law:
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub. L. 88–352, 78 Stat.
241, enacted July 2, 1964) is a landmark civil rights and labor law in the
United States that outlaws discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex,
national origin, and later sexual orientation and gender identity. It prohibits
unequal application of voter registration requirements, racial segregation in
schools and public accommodations…
If systemic racism or institutional racism were a serious
problem in America – let alone touched “every facet of American life,” – as
Biden says, what do you think would happen? Assume, as Biden and woke Democrats
generally seem to think, that all white people are racists, there are thousands
of black attorneys, attorneys general, prosecutors, judges, legislators and
occupiers of the highest seats of government. If there was a scintilla of truth
in this statement there would be thousands, maybe hundreds of thousands of
lawsuits filed under the Civil Rights Act. But there are no such lawsuits. The
claim that “systemic racism touches every facet of American life” is itself a
racist lie, whose evident target is white people, since according to the woke,
“people of color” can’t be racist.
Not surprisingly, one of Biden’s first week initiatives
was a systemically racist plan to provide financial assistance to small
businesses whose owners were black, Asian, Hispanic, and Native American. Only
whites were excluded. But Asian Americans as an ethnic group have higher
incomes than white Americans. So what rationale for this policy is there but
anti-white racism?
How virulent is the anti-white and anti-American racism
of the Democrat Party? Consider this unhinged but also unchallenged statement
by Vice President Kamala Harris defending the Black Lives Matters rioters whose
“protests” caused billions in property damage, led to 25 deaths and injured
2000 police officers in the summer of 2020: “The reality is that the life of a
black person in America has never been treated as fully human… It’s no wonder
people are taking to the streets [to protest]. And I support them.”
In other words, the 44th president of the United States,
the “most admired man in America” for over a decade wasn’t treated as “fully
human,” or Martin Luther King – the only American with a national holiday in
his honor (courtesy of President Ronald Reagan). This lunatic hatred of white
America is now not only acceptable in the Democrat Party but the hateful creed
of its leaders.
To be fair, there are two main areas of systemic racism
in America today, but both are supported and enforced by the Democrat Party,
which is why they exist. The first is the systemic racism that traps inner city
children – mainly ethnic minorities – in inferior schools that for fifty years
and more have failed to provide 80 percent of them with the skills that are
necessary to succeed. Every year 40% of inner city children drop out of school
without graduating, and 40% of those who do, are functionally illiterate. The
Democrat teacher unions – the same which went on strike during the pandemic
with full pay at the expense of children who could not afford to miss school –
exert absolute control over these school systems and have stifled all attempts
at reforms. They are unalterably opposed to every alternative to their racist
policies, from charter schools to vouchers that give inner city kids the same
privilege as their middle-class counterparts, to allow their parents to enroll
them in schools that will teach them.
The other nationwide systemic racism is affirmative action
programs which discriminate against all ethnic groups but those designated
“oppressed” – a convenient leftist fiction used to justify all manner of
injustice. If you’re black or Pacific Islander or Hispanic, go to the head of
the line for a job, a promotion, a place at Harvard, a coveted training
position to become a surgeon or other medical specialist. If you’re white or an
ethnic minority whose community supports educational values and scores well on
exams, like Asians, forget that place at Harvard, you’re screwed.
How racist is that? And how readily is this racism
supported by a president and an administration, which like our most dedicated
foreign enemies thinks America is a nation of slavers and racist oppressors,
while at the same time our borders are under siege by black, brown and Asian
minorities desperate to become citizens of the most tolerant, inclusive and
egalitarian society on earth.
America will not be healed until the Democrat Party
returns to its senses, repudiates its current racist attitudes, and stops
demonizing its opponents as what Speaker Nancy Pelosi has called “enemies of
the state.”











