Thursday, October 20, 2016

IBD/TIPP Poll: Americans Want Special Prosecutor For Clinton Crimes

Bill Clinton's fundraising activities at the Clinton Foundation raise serious questions -- questions that only a special prosecutor can answer. (AP)

Scandal: Hillary Clinton says if she wins the presidency, it might be a good idea for former President Clinton to cut his ties to the Clinton Family Foundation. Good idea? A new IBD/TIPP Poll suggests that average Americans are way ahead of her on this issue.
"I don't think there are conflicts of interest" with having former Bill Clinton run a foundation that raises money around the world during her campaign, Hillary Clinton said in an interview with ABC News on Tuesday. Americans, it seem, would disagree. 

Average people have a far less benign view of what's gone on at the Clinton Foundation. And it looms as a major problem for Clinton as she pursues the presidency. 

In our latest IBD/TIPP Poll, taken the week of Aug. 26 to Sept. 1, shows that Americans are increasingly wary of the Clinton Foundation's questionable practices, which IBD has written about extensively. The poll of 934 adults has a margin of error of +/- 3.3 percentage points. 

The ups and downs of the Clinton Foundation, it turns out, are of big interest to average Americans. Some 72% in the IBD/TIPP Poll said they are following it. 

Perhaps more significantly, of the 72% who are following it, three-fourths — or 77% -- believe that donors to the Clinton Foundation received special access and favors from the State Department while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state from 2009 to 2013. 

And there is, surprisingly, bipartisan agreement on this: Some 55% of Democrats agree that the Clintons used public office to dispense favors to their foundation's friends. 

Yet, those investigating both the Clinton email scandal and the related questions about the Clinton Foundation have been met with hostility by Clinton partisans. 

FBI Director James Comey, who all but indicted Hillary with his words when he announced he would not prosecute her, this week even had to defend his decision to release more documents from his investigation. 

For the record, his investigation — and subsequent testimony to Congress — found that Hillary lied repeatedly about her home-brew email server and about sending and receiving classified information on it. All of these are crimes. 

But even bigger questions are now being raised about the cozy ties between the Clinton Foundation and Hillary's State Department. Though she promised an arms-length relationship to the foundation when she was first named secretary of state, at least 181 Clinton Foundation donors — companies, individuals, even countries — lobbied the State Department during her years there. 

Indeed, more than half the non-government people who met with Hillary — 85 of 154 — while she was in office gave money to the Clinton Foundation. Those donors, together, gave as much as $156 million to the Clinton Foundation, according to an Associated Press analysis. 

It strongly suggests a quid-pro-quo relationship, given that the State Department can act as a favor-giver and gatekeeper for business deals and other lucrative arrangements around the world.
It reeks of a corrupt pay-to-play system based on a major conflict of interest, in which Hillary Clinton was ideally positioned to grant government favors to those who had already enriched her, her husband Bill and her daughter, Chelsea, by giving boatloads of money to the eponymous family foundation. 

Charles Ortel, a highly regarded Wall Street financial expert, took a look at the Clinton Foundation's books over the last year or so and this week published his partial conclusion: "To informed analysts, the Clinton Foundation appears to be a rogue charity that has neither been organized nor operated lawfully from inception in October 1997 to date ... it is a case study in international charity fraud, of mammoth proportions." 

Based on what appears to be repeated violations of the law and a shocking disregard for the minimal ethics requirements of government officials, it's time for a special prosecutor of Hillary Clinton to look into both the family foundation and the emails. 

Our polling shows Americans would definitely support such a move, either before or after the election.
According to IBD/TIPP, nearly two-thirds (63%) think a special prosecutor should be appointed. And 88% of Republicans and 68% of Independents want a special prosecutor to look into the possible misconduct. The sentiment that something wrong has taken place is overwhelming.

To save the nation from another failed presidency, it's time to put this issue to rest by naming a special prosecutor. 

Focus Groups: Donald Trump Won The Final Debate and Hillary Clinton Flopped

By Victor Smith


The analysis of the debate that Trump won comes from Frank I. Luntz, an American political consultant, pollster, and “public opinion guru” best known for his focus groups during the past few debates.

Overview: It is clear Donald Trump came out on top. When Hillary Clinton was questioned about the Clinton Foundation money laundering she ignored it. Usually that’s a sign of someone lying and trying to avoid the subject. Donald Trump’s strong points were trade and fixing a corrupt system.

Focus Group Reactions:

Hillary Clinton Supporters Like Donald Trump’s Stance On The Economy

When Donald Trump spoke about Hillary Clinton’s failures, even her own supporters sided with Donald Trump.

Hillary Clinton’s answer on the Clinton Foundation was a failure.

Voters liked when Donald Trump held the State Department Accountable.

Voters Liked Donald Trump’s Response to NAFTA and TPP.

When Hillary Clinton started blaming Russia, the voters didn’t like it.

FLASHBACK: Gore explains why he won't concede election - Last week Hillary agreed he 'won' 2000


Wednesday, October 19, 2016

WATCH: New BOMBSHELL video just released by James O’Keefe on MASS VOTER FRAUD

By The Right Scoop
James O'Keefe is out with this latest bombshell video entitled "Mass Voter Fraud":

In the second video of James O'Keefe's new explosive series on the DNC and Hillary Clinton campaign, Democratic party operatives tell us how to successfully commit voter fraud on a massive scale. Scott Foval, who has since been fired, admits that the Democrats have been rigging elections for fifty years.

Tuesday, October 18, 2016

Shocking Liberal Fascism Video: Trump Rallies Violence Traced to Clinton Campaign and the DNC

Rigging the Election - Video I: Clinton Campaign and DNC Incite Violence at Trump Rallies

To view Video 1 filmed by Project Veritas Action Project, click the below link:

Dirty Tricks Operative Unwittingly Provides Dark Money Trail to the DNC and Clinton Campaign

Violence at Trump Rallies Traced to Clinton Campaign and the DNC Through Process Called Birddogging

Shady Coordinated Communications Chain Between DNC, Clinton Campaign, Hillary Clinton’s Super PAC and Other Organizations Revealed

Key Clinton Operative: “It doesn’t matter what the friggin’ legal and ethics people say, we need to win this motherfucker”

Project Veritas Action has just released the first video in a multi-part series which exposes the dark secrets at the highest levels of the DNC and Clinton presidential campaign. Using hidden cameras, undercover journalists reveal key players coordinating clandestine operations in support of Hillary Clinton’s campaign. The video, supported by emails recently released by WikiLeaks, shows that the dirty tricks, lines of communications and the money trail lead all the way to the top.

The video discloses numerous examples of behind-the-scenes shady practices with consequences most Americans have seen on national television at Donald Trump campaign rallies across the country. What the media hasn’t reported is that the Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee has been directing these activities with, at very best, a very thin veil of plausible deniability. This series of videos is the culmination of a year-long investigation by the undercover journalists at Project Veritas Action.

Scott Foval is the National Field Director for a non-profit organization named Americans United for Change. In the video, he told an undercover investigator that they contract “directly with the DNC and the [Clinton] campaign both.”

“I am contracted to him [Bob Creamer],” says Foval to an undercover reporter. “But I answer to the head of Special Events for the DNC and the head of special events and political for the campaign.”

“The [Clinton] campaign pays DNC, DNC pays Democracy Partners, Democracy Partners pays the Foval Group, The Foval Group goes and executes the shit…” continued Foval. “Democracy Partners is the tip of the spear on that stuff.”

Bob Creamer founded and is listed as a partner on the website of the Democratic consulting firm Democracy Partners. He is the husband of Jan Shakowsky, a congresswoman from Chicago. In 2005, he plead guilty to tax violations and bank fraud.

“Wherever Trump and Pence are going to be, we have events and we have a whole team across the country that does that both consultants and people from the Democratic Party,” Creamer told an investigator. “And the Democratic Party apparatus and the people from the campaign, the Clinton campaign and my role with the campaign, is to manage all that.”

The undercover investigation reveals compelling evidence of a dark money conspiracy and likely violations of federal campaign coordination laws by the Hillary Clinton campaign, Clinton’s Super PAC Priorities USA and the Democratic National Committee.

“The thing that we have to watch, is making sure there is a double blind between the actual campaign and the actual DNC and what we’re doing,” states Foval while conduit of information between the DNC, Clinton campaign, Political Action Committees, the AFL-CIO and other organizations. “There’s a double blind there.  So they can plausibly deny that they knew anything about it.”

Foval explains, “The campaigns and DNC cannot go near Priorities, but I guaran-damn-tee you that the people who run the Super PACs all talk to each other and we and a few other people are the hubs of that communication.”

“I just had a call with the campaign and the DNC, every day at one o’clock,” says Creamer subordinate Zulema Rodriguez.

When discussing what sorts of dirty tricks Foval, Creamer and others manage at the bequest of the DNC and Clinton campaign, a Project Veritas Action investigator asks Foval if he would recognize Foval’s work.

“Oh, I know you do,” responds Foval. “Everybody does.”

“You remember the Iowa state fair thing where Scott Walker grabbed the sign out of the dude’s hand and then the dude kind of gets roughed up right in front of the stage right there on camera?” Foval asks. “That was all us. The guy that got roughed up is my counterpart who works for Bob.”

Foval adds that they “planted multiple people in that front area around him and in the back to make sure there wasn’t just an accident happen up front, there was also a reaction that happened out back.”

Foval also references Shirley Teeter, a sixty-nine-year-old lady who claims that she was assaulted at a Trump rally in North Carolina.

“She was one of our activists,” he says while introducing the term bird dogging to the political lexicon.

The phrase bird doggingr also appears in an email released by WikiLeaks where Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook suggests it might be a tactic to employ to shore up support with Hispanic voters. 

“So the term bird dogging, you put people in the line, at the front which means that they have to get there at six in the morning because they have to get in front at the rally, so that when Trump comes down the rope line, they’re the ones asking him the question in front of the reporter, because they’re pre-placed there,” explains Foval. “To funnel that kind of operation, you have to start back with people two weeks ahead of time and train them how to ask questions.  You have to train them to bird dog.”
“I’m basically deputy rapid response director for the DNC for all things Trump on the ground,” says a new character in the undercover video.

This character says his name is Aaron Black, but it is ireally Aaron Minter. “Yeah, and nobody is really supposed to know about me.”

In the hidden camera video, Black shares credit with Creamer for the Chicago Trump rally which was shut down.

“So the Chicago protest when they shut all that, that was us,” says Black/Minter. “It was more him [Bob Creamer] than me, but none of this is supposed to come back to us, because we want it coming from people, we don’t want it to come from the party.  So if we do a protest and it’s a DNC protest, right away the press is going to say partisan.  But if I’m in there coordinating with all the troops on the ground and sort of playing the field general but they are the ones talking to the cameras, then it’s actually people.  But if we send out press advisories with DNC on them and Clinton campaign it just doesn’t have that same effect.”

“So B and I did the Chicago Trump event where we shut down, like all the yeah…” confirms Rodriguez, who also admitted to shutting down the highway at a Trump event in Arizona.

“I’m saying we have mentally ill people, that we pay to do shit, make no mistake,” says Foval in the video. “Over the last twenty years, I’ve paid off a few homeless guys to do some crazy stuff, and I’ve also taken them for dinner, and I’ve also made sure they had a hotel, and a shower.  And I put them in a program.  Like I’ve done that.  But the reality is, a lot of people especially our union guys.  A lot of our union guys…they’ll do whatever you want.  They’re rock and roll. When I need to get something done in Arkansas, the first guy I call is the head of the AFL-CIO down there, because he will say, ‘What do you need?’  And I will say, I need a guy who will do this, this and this.  And they find that guy.  And that guy will be like, Hell yeah, let’s do it.”

“Tomorrow we release our next installment of this investigation where we expose a voter fraud scheme discussed at the highest levels.  The Hillary Clinton campaign is leaving nothing to chance as we have seen and will continue reveal as our undercover investigation into the dark machine of the Hillary Clinton campaign continues,” says Project Veritas Action President James O’Keefe. “Hillary, check your email.”

Project Veritas Action was founded by James O’Keefe to investigate and expose corruption, dishonesty, self-dealing, waste, fraud and other misconduct.

Corrupt Clinton: A Dozen Corporations Paid Millions For State Department Favors

CLINTON, INC: A dozen companies that lobbied Hillary Clinton’s State Department not only showered millions on the Clinton Foundation, they employed lobbyists who were fundraisers for Clinton’s campaigns.
USA Today reports:
The nexus among private companies, Hillary Clinton’s State Department and the Clinton family foundations is closer and more complex than even Donald Trump has claimed so far.
While it is widely known that some companies and foreign governments gave money to the foundations, perhaps in an effort to gain favor, one of the key parts of the puzzle hasn’t been reported: At least a dozen of those same companies lobbied the State Department, using lobbyists who doubled as major Clinton campaign fundraisers.
Those companies gave as much as $16 million to the Clinton charities.
At least four of the lobbyists they hired are “Hillblazers,” the Clinton campaign’s name for supporters who have raised $100,000 or more for her current White House race.
Two of the four also raised funds for Clinton’s unsuccessful 2008 presidential bid.
If elected, Clinton would be the first U.S. president to have had previous involvement with a foundation that raised millions of dollars tied to foreign interests and other donors, said Douglas Brinkley, a history professor at Rice University.

ICYMI: FBI documents allege that a top State Department official with close ties to Hillary Clinton offered agents a “quid pro quo” in order to hide the true extent of her exposure of classified information.
Politico reports:
A top State Department official allegedly “pressured” the FBI to downgrade the classification of one of Hillary Clinton’s emails as part of a “quid pro quo,” according to documents released by the bureau on Monday.
The accusation of such an arrangement came from an interview the FBI conducted with an official in its records management division.
Notes from the interview were released as part of the FBI’s public posting of documents related to its now-closed investigation into Clinton’s use of a private email server.
In the interview, the unnamed official says that Patrick Kennedy, undersecretary of state for management, tried in late June or early July of last year to get the FBI to change a classified email to unclassified, in exchange for the State Department allowing the FBI to place agents in more countries.

RNC Chairman Reince Priebus blasted the quid pro quo revelations.
The Hill reports:
Republican National Committee (RNC) Chairman Reince Priebus on Monday accused the Obama administration of deliberately keeping Hillary Clinton from being held accountable for her handling of classified information while secretary of State.
“It is deeply troubling that a top State Department official close to Hillary Clinton offered the FBI a ‘quid pro quo’ to hide the full extent to which she mishandled classified information,” Priebus said in a statement.
Reports emerged earlier Monday that a State Department official pressured the FBI to change the top secret classification of an email from Clinton's private server because it “caused problems.”


Hillary Clinton “blatantly disregarded” security protocols while serving as secretary of state.
The Washington Examiner reports:
A former diplomatic security agent told the FBI that Hillary Clinton "blatantly disregarded" security protocols while serving as secretary of state.
The revelation came in a 100-page collection of notes released Monday from the FBI's year-long investigation of Clinton's server.
State Department staff members also expressed their view that "Clinton was using her position as secretary of state to campaign for President of the United States."
According to the diplomatic security agent, whose name was redacted, Clinton flouted diplomatic standards by refusing to ride in an armored limosine with U.S. ambassadors while traveling abroad, instead choosing to ride only with longtime aide Huma Abedin. "This frequently resulted in complaints from ambassadors who were insulted and embarrassed by this breach of protocol," the FBI notes said.

FBI agents are growing frustrated with Director Comey’s leadership following the bureau’s decision not to recommend criminal charges against Hillary Clinton or any of her top aides.
The Daily Caller reports:
FBI agents say the bureau is alarmed over Director James Comey’s decision to not suggest that the Justice Department prosecute Hillary Clinton over her mishandling of classified information.
According to an interview transcript given to The Daily Caller, provided by an intermediary who spoke to two federal agents with the bureau last Friday, agents are frustrated by Comey’s leadership.
“This is a textbook case where a grand jury should have been convened, but was not. That is appalling,” an FBI special agent who has worked public corruption and criminal cases said of the decision. “We talk about it in the office and don’t know how Comey can keep going.”

Complied by the RNC.

Is the System Rigged? You Betcha.

By Patrick J. Buchanan
“Remember, it’s a rigged system. It’s a rigged election,” said Donald Trump in New Hampshire on Saturday.
The stunned recoil in this city suggests this bunker buster went right down the chimney. As the French put it, “Il n’y a que la verite qui blesse.” It is only the truth that hurts.
In what sense is the system rigged?
Consider Big Media — the elite columnists and commentators, the dominant national press, and the national and cable networks, save FOX. Not in this writer’s lifetime has there been such blanket hatred and hostility of a presidential candidate of a major party.
“So what?” They reply. “We have a free press!”
But in this election, Big Media have burst out of the closet as an adjunct of the regime and the attack arm of the Clinton campaign, aiming to bring Trump down.
Half a century ago, Theodore White wrote of the power and bias of the “adversary press” that sought to bring down Richard Nixon.
The power of the press in America,” wrote Teddy, “is a primordial one. It sets the agenda of public discussion; and this sweeping power is unrestrained by any law. It determines what people will talk about and think about — an authority that in other nations is reserved for tyrants, priests, parties and mandarins.”
On ABC’s “This Week,” Newt Gingrich volunteered on Sunday that, “without the unending one-sided assault of the news media, Trump would be beating Hillary by 15 points.”
On this one, Newt is right.
With all due respect, as adversaries, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi are not terribly formidable. Big Media is the power that sustains the forces of globalism against those of Americanism.
Is the system rigged? Ask yourself.
For half a century, the U.S. Supreme Court has systematically de-Christianized and paganized American society and declared abortion and homosexual marriage constitutional rights.
Where did these unelected jurists get the right to impose their views and values upon us, and remake America in their own secularist image? Was that really the Court’s role in the Constitution?
How did we wind up with an all-powerful judicial tyranny in a nation the Founding Fathers created as a democratic republic?
There are more than 11 million illegal immigrants here, with millions more coming. Yet the government consistently refuses to enforce the immigration laws of the United States.
Why should those Americans whose ancestors created, fought, bled and died to preserve America not believe they and their children are being dispossessed of a country that was their patrimony — and without their consent?
When did the country vote to convert the America we grew up in into the Third World country our descendants will inherit in 2042?
In the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a Congressional majority voted to end discrimination against black folks.
When did we vote to institute pervasive discrimination against white folks, especially white males, with affirmative action, quotas and racial set-asides? Even in blue states like California, affirmative action is routinely rejected in statewide ballots.
Yet it remains regime policy, embedded in the bureaucracy.
In 2015, in the Democratic primaries, the big enthusiastic crowds were all for 75-year-old Socialist senator Bernie Sanders.
We now know, thanks to leaked emails, that not only the super delegates and the Obama White House but a collaborationist press and the DNC were colluding to deny Sanders any chance at the nomination.
The fix was in. Ask Sanders if he thinks the system is rigged.
If there is an issue upon which Americans agree, it is that they want secure borders and an end to trade policies that have shipped abroad the jobs, and arrested the wages, of working Americans.
Yet in a private speech that netted her $225,000 from Brazilian bankers, Hillary Clinton confided that she dreams of a “common market, with open trade and open borders” from Nome, Alaska, to Patagonia.
That would mean the end of the USA as a unique, sovereign and independent nation. But the American press, whose survival depends upon the big ad dollars of transnational corporations, is more interested in old tapes of the Donald on The Howard Stern Show.
As present, it appears that in 2017, we may get a government headed by Hillary Clinton, and an opposition headed by Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell.
Is that what the people were hoping for, working for, voting for in the primaries of 2016? Or is this what they were voting against?
Big money and the media power of the establishment elites and the transnationals may well prevail.
And if they do, Middle America — those who cling to their bibles, bigotries and guns in Barack Obama’s depiction, those “deplorables” who are “racist, sexist, xenophobic, homophobic,” who are “not America” and are “irredeemable” in Hillary Clinton’s depiction — will have to accept the new regime.
But that does not mean they must love it, like it or respect it.
Because, in the last analysis, yes, Virginia, the system is rigged.