latest emails show that State and the foundation were one seamless
By KIMBERLEY A.
This is the week that the steady drip, drip,
drip of details about Hillary Clinton’s server turned into a waterfall.
This is the week that we finally learned why Mrs. Clinton used a private
communications setup, and what it hid. This is the week, in short, that we
found out that the infamous server was designed to hide that Mrs. Clinton for
three years served as the U.S. Secretary of the Clinton Foundation.
In March this column argued that while Mrs.
Clinton’s mishandling of classified information was important, it missed the
bigger point. The Democratic nominee obviously didn’t set up her server with
the express purpose of exposing national secrets—that was incidental. She set
up the server to keep secret the details of the Clintons’ private life—a life
built around an elaborate and sweeping money-raising and self-promoting entity
known as the Clinton Foundation.
Had Secretary Clinton kept the foundation at
arm’s length while in office—as obvious ethical standards would have
dictated—there would never have been any need for a private server, or even
private email. The vast majority of her electronic communications would have
related to her job at the State Department, with maybe that occasional yoga
schedule. And those Freedom of Information Act officers would have had little
difficulty—when later going through a state.gov email—screening out the clearly
“personal” before making her records public. This is how it works for everybody
Mrs. Clinton’s problem—as we now know from
this week’s release of emails from Huma Abedin’s private Clinton-server
account—was that there was no divide
between public and private. Mrs. Clinton’s State Department and her family
foundation were one seamless entity—employing the same people, comparing
schedules, mixing foundation donors with State supplicants. This is why she
maintained a secret server, and why she deleted 15,000 emails that should have
been turned over to the government.
Most of the focus on this week’s Abedin emails
has centered on the disturbing examples of Clinton Foundation executive Doug
Band negotiating State favors for foundation donors. But equally instructive in
the 725 pages released by Judicial Watch is the frequency and banality of most
of the email interaction. Mr. Band asks if Hillary’s doing this conference, or
having that meeting, and when she’s going to Brazil. Ms. Abedin responds that
she’s working on it, or will get this or that answer. These aren’t the emails
of mere casual acquaintances; they don’t even bother with salutations or
signoffs. These are the emails of two people engaged in the same
purpose—serving the State-Clinton Foundation nexus.
The other undernoted but important revelation
is that the media has been looking in the wrong place. The focus is on Mrs.
Clinton’s missing emails, and no doubt those 15,000 FBI-recovered texts contain
nuggets. Then again, Mrs. Clinton was a busy woman, and most of the details of
her daily State/foundation life would have been handled by trusted aides. This
is why they, too, had private email. Top marks to Judicial Watch for pursuing
Ms. Abedin’s file from the start. A new urgency needs to go into seeing similar
emails of former Clinton Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills.
Mostly, we learned this week that Mrs.
Clinton’s foundation issue goes far beyond the “appearance” of a conflict of
interest. This is straight-up pay to play. When Mr. Band sends an email
demanding a Hillary meeting with the crown prince of Bahrain and notes that
he’s a “good friend of ours,” what Mr. Band means is that the crown prince had
contributed millions to a Clinton Global Initiative scholarship program, and
therefore has bought face time. It doesn’t get more clear-cut, folks.
That’s highlighted by the Associated Press’s
extraordinary finding this week that of the 154 outside people Mrs. Clinton met
with in the first years of her tenure, more than half were Clinton Foundation
donors. Clinton apologists, like Vox’s Matthew Yglesias, are claiming that
statistic is overblown, because the 154 doesn’t include thousands of meetings
held with foreign diplomats and U.S. officials.
Nice try. As the nation’s top diplomat, Mrs.
Clinton was obliged to meet with diplomats and officials—not with others. Only
a blessed few outsiders scored meetings with the harried secretary of state
and, surprise, most of the blessed were Clinton Foundation donors.
Mrs. Clinton’s only whisper of grace is that
it remains (as it always does in potential cases of corruption) hard to connect
the dots. There are “quids” (foundation donations) and “quos” (Bahrain arms
deals) all over the place, but no precise evidence of “pros.” Count on the
Clinton menagerie to dwell in that sliver of a refuge.
But does it even matter? What we discovered
this week is that one of the nation’s top officials created a private server
that housed proof that she continued a secret, ongoing entwinement with her
family foundation—despite ethics agreements—and that she destroyed public
records. If that alone doesn’t disqualify her for the presidency, it’s hard to
know what would.
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks to supporters at a rally in Erie, Pennsylvania. Photo: Getty Images
Take a drive outside US cities
By Salena Zito
If you drive anywhere in Pennsylvania, from the turnpike
to the old US routes to the dirt roads connecting small towns like Hooversville
with “bigger” small towns like Somerset, you might conclude that Donald Trump
is ahead in this state by double digits. Large signs, small signs, homemade signs, signs that wrap
around barns, signs that go from one end of a fence to another dot the
landscape with such frequency that, if you were playing the old-fashioned
road-trip game of counting cows, you would hit 100 in just one small town like
In Ruffsdale, I am pretty sure I saw more than 100 Trump
barn displays a Trump banner in Johnstown, Pennsylvania. Photo: Getty Images
It’s as if people here have not turned on the television
to hear pundits drone on and on about how badly Trump is losing in
It’s not just visual: In interview after interview in all
corners of the state, I’ve found that Trump’s support across the ideological
spectrum remains strong. Democrats, Republicans, independents, people who have
not voted in presidential elections for years — they have not wavered in their
Two components of these voters’ answers and profiles
remain consistent: They are middle-class and they do not live in a big city.
They are suburban to rural and are not poor — an element I found fascinating,
until a Gallup survey last week confirmed that what I’ve gathered in interviews
is more than just freakishly anecdotal.
The Gallup analysis, based on 87,000 interviews over the
past year, shows that while economic anxiety and Trump’s appeal are
intertwined, his supporters for the most part do not make less than average
Americans (not those in New York City or Washington, perhaps, but their Main
Street peers) and are less likely to be unemployed.
The study backs up what many of my interviews across the
state have found — that these people are more concerned about their children
While Trump supporters here are overwhelmingly white,
their support has little to do with race (yes, you’ll always find one or two
who make race the issue), but has a lot to do with a perceived loss of power.
Not power in the way that Washington or Wall Street
boardrooms view power, but power in the sense that these people see a
diminishing respect for them and their ways of life, their work ethic, their
tendency to not be mobile. (Many live in the same eight square miles that their
father’s father’s father lived in.)
Thirty years ago, such people determined the country’s
standards in entertainment, music, food, clothing, politics, personal values.
Today, they are the people who are accused of creating every social injustice
imaginable; when anything in society fails, they get blamed.
The places where they live lack economic opportunities
for the next generation; they know their children and grandchildren will never
experience the comfortable situations they had growing up — surrounded by
family who lived next door, able to find a great job without going to college,
both common traits among many successful small-business owners in the state.
Trump visits McLanahan Corporation headquarters in Hollidaysburg,
Pennsylvania. Photo: Reuters
These Trump supporters are not the kind you find on
Twitter saying dumb or racist things; many of them don’t have the time or the
patience to engage in social media because they are too busy working and living
life in real time.
These are voters who are intellectually offended watching
the Affordable Care Act crumble because they warned six years ago that it was
an unworkable government overreach.
They are the same people who wonder why President Obama
has not taken a break from a week of golfing to address the devastating floods
in Louisiana. (As one woman told me, “It appears as if he only makes statements
during tragedies if there is political gain attached.”)
wave signs for Trump as he speaks at a rally in Erie, Pennsylvania. Photo: Getty
Voice such a remark, and you risk being labeled a racist
in many parts of America.
The Joe Six-Pack stereotype of a Trump supporter was not
created in a vacuum; it’s real and it’s out there.
Yet, if you dig down deep into the Gallup survey — or,
better yet, take a drive 15 minutes outside of most cities in America — you
will learn a different story.
That is, if you look and listen.
Zito is a Pittsburgh Tribune-Review editorial page columnist.
yesterday about the Huma Abedin emails discovered by Judicial Watch that
show a pattern of corruption, whereby donors to the Clinton Foundation, the
Clintons’ personal slush fund, got access to Secretary of State Clinton for
help with their problems or priorities.
Today the Associated
Press follows up with a systematic and devastating analysis of Hillary’s
calendar at the State Department:
than half the people outside the government who met with Hillary Clinton while
she was secretary of state gave money – either personally or through companies
or groups – to the Clinton Foundation. It’s an extraordinary proportion
indicating her possible ethics challenges if elected president.
I would say, it
indicates the complete lack of ethics that she would display if she were
least 85 of 154 people from private interests who met or had phone
conversations scheduled with Clinton while she led the State Department donated
to her family charity or pledged commitments to its international programs,
according to a review of State Department calendars released so far to The
Associated Press. Combined, the 85 donors contributed as much as $156 million. At
least 40 donated more than $100,000 each, and 20 gave more than $1 million.
So it wasn’t
absolutely impossible to get a meeting with the Secretary of State if you
didn’t contribute to her slush fund, but it was extremely unlikely.
frequency of the overlaps shows the intermingling of access and donations, and
fuels perceptions that giving the foundation money was a price of admission for
face time with Clinton.
Evidently, a great
many rich and powerful people around the world had the “perception” that the
way to get on her calendar was to contribute to her personal foundation. It
seems pretty obvious that this wasn’t just perception, it was reality. The
truth is even worse than the numbers above suggest, since the AP left
foreign governments out of its calculations:
met with representatives of at least 16 foreign governments that donated as
much as $170 million to the Clinton charity, but they were not
included in AP’s calculations because such meetings would presumably have been
part of her diplomatic duties.
A given meeting may
or may not have legitimately been part of Hillary’s duties, and her priorities
in dealing with foreign governments may well have been influenced by their
contributions to Bill and Hillary, Inc. Given everything else we know, in all
probability her priorities were so influenced, and, in any case, it is
obvious that a number of foreign governments believed they could buy favor with
the Clintons by contributing to their foundation.
turned the State Department into a protection racket.
The extent to which,
in recent years, that characterization could fairly be applied to the federal
government as a whole is a topic for another day. Whatever you think of the
corruption we have seen under the Obama administration, the Clintons promise
to take it to a whole new level should the voters be foolish enough to
re-install them in the White House.
The Wall Street Journal Opinion No
other couple in American politics can offer what the Clintons have to sell.
Many Clinton scandals
ago, when Hillary
Clinton was trying to explain how she’d parlayed a $1,000 stake in cattle
futures into $100,000 in 10 months (by talking to other people and reading The
Wall Street Journal) folks were skeptical. How, they asked, could a novice make
so much money in so short a time in such a risky market?
Turns out Mrs.
Clinton is a better learner than she’s given credit for, and the Clinton emails
released by Judicial Watch on Monday prove it. The emails were pried out of the
system by Freedom of Information Act lawsuits, and they suggest why the Clinton
Foundation could be so attractive to the rich and mighty. When a donor had a
problem that required the secretary of state’s attention, there was Doug Band—a
Clinton Foundation exec—emailing Hillary’s top staffers at the State Department
to ask a favor.
Take a June 23, 2009,
email from Doug Band to Huma Abedin. In his email Mr. Band noted that the Crown
Prince of Bahrain (a “good friend of ours”) was asking to see Mrs. Clinton.
There are, of course, many ways to be a “good friend,” but one sure way would
be to contribute between $50,000 and $100,000 to the Clinton Foundation, as the
kingdom of Bahrain had done. Not to mention that the prince had also spent $32
million on a scholarship launched through the Clinton Global Initiative.
Ms. Abedin responded
that the prince had sought a meeting through “normal” channels but had been
shot down. Less than 48 hours after Mr. Band had asked her, Ms. Abedin reported
that “we have reached out through official channels.” The meeting was on.
It isn’t the only
favor Mr. Band requested. A month earlier, he had emailed Ms. Abedin to ask her
help in getting an English soccer player a visa to the U.S. The player was
supposed to come to Las Vegas for a team celebration, but he needed a special
interview with the visa section at the American Embassy in London due to a
“criminal charge” against him.
Because of this, the
office of Sen. Barbara
Boxer (D., Calif.) had refused to intervene. Mr. Band’s email
made clear the request was on behalf of Casey Wasserman, a sports and
entertainment exec who had contributed between $5 million and $10 million to
the Clinton Foundation via the Wasserman Foundation.
These are only two of
the many email exchanges in which Ms. Abedin was asked to intervene on
behalf of some Clinton Foundation donor. These latest emails fit the same
pattern as another batch released earlier this month, which showed Mr. Band
asking Ms. Abedin and longtime Clinton aide Cheryl Mills for a meeting with a
U.S. ambassador on behalf of a foreign businessman, as well as seeking a job
for someone he described as “important to take care of.”
President Tom Fitton sums it up this way: “It looks like the State
Department was outsourcing its work to the Clinton Foundation.”
The model worked well
for the Clintons, and some believe the Clinton Foundation will be copied by
other pols, who will set up spouses or friends with foundations in hopes of
attracting the big dollars that they can use to advance their brands, reward
their friends and operate as a de facto permanent political campaign—all under
the garb of charity.
No doubt some will
try. But no one will be as successful as the Clintons have been.
The reason is simple.
The Clintons are a business partnership with something that no other political
couple has to sell. True, all ex-presidents hit the speaking circuit and have
charities and foundations. Even so, the Clintons are unique in having an
ex-president with a spouse in play, not only as secretary of state but as a
possible president herself. If you are a foreign government or a wealthy
businessmen, a donation to the Clinton Foundation might look like an
excellent investment at just about any price.
Quid pro quo is
notoriously hard to prove in such cases, and we will never know what (if
anything) Mrs. Clinton or State delivered in return. We’re asked to
believe that it was somehow an accident that so many of the millions former
President Bill Clinton raked in from speaking fees would come from
companies, countries or people who had business before a State Department run
by his wife. The truth is, this was inevitable under the Clinton Foundation
business model. And it beggars belief to think all these dollars were being
given out without an expectation of something in return.
In the meantime we
are back to a presidential campaign in which Donald Trump’s
critics attack his business record by pointing out that the New York City
real-estate mogul doesn’t even own many of the buildings that bear his name.
What he’s selling is the Trump brand.
Then again, when it
comes to dubious branding for profit, these latest emails make Mr. Trump
look like a piker compared with Mrs. Clinton.
year-long investigation of Hillary Clinton’s private email server uncovered
14,900 emails and documents from her time as secretary of state that had not
been disclosed by her attorneys, and a federal judge on Monday pressed the
State Department to begin releasing emails sooner than mid-October as it
Department lawyers said last week that the State Department would review and
turn over Clinton’s work-related emails to a conservative legal group. The
records are among “tens of thousands” of documents found by the FBI in its
probe and turned over to the State Department, Justice Department attorney Lisa
Ann Olson said Monday in court.
Clinton documents are nearly 50 percent more than the roughly 30,000 emails
that Clinton’s lawyers deemed work-related and returned to the department in
the State Department and Judicial Watch, the legal group, are negotiating a
plan for the release of the emails in a civil public records lawsuit before
U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg of Washington.
When it comes to getting in the way of the Clinton family
and their political agenda, none are spared. Gen. Colin Powell has learned this lesson the hard
way over the last few months. In an interview with People
magazine, Powell says that Hillary Clinton has been trying to throw
his career under the bus since being reprimanded by FBI
investigators. “Her people have been trying to pin
it on me,” he said referring to her State Department e-mail scandal.“The truth is, she was using [the private
email server] for a year before I sent her a memo telling her what I did." In a statement provided to the AP, Powell told Clinton
back in 2009 that he did use a private AOL account for unclassified messages
while leading the State Department under President George W. Bush and that it
"vastly improved" communications. However, of the emails reviewed in Clinton's FBI
investigation, 113 contained classified information, and three of those had
Jerry Falwell Jr. is president of Liberty University. Chip Somodevilla/Getty)
In the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections, American
voters were forced to choose between a liberal Democrat and weak establishment
Republicans. Democrats won both times. In the 2010 and 2014 midterms, tired of
the leftist agenda, voters sent an unmistakable message to Washington:
Republicans took control of the Senate and filled more seats in the House than
at any time since 1929. Still, nothing changed.
In 2016, we have a clear choice.
This moment is historic because Donald Trump is not
another establishment Republican.
We have lived through nearly eight years of weak
leadership from a president who did not sign the charter to create the Islamic
State but whose policies had the intended or unintended effect (we will be
debating that for decades) of breathing life into the lungs of the terrorist
group. President Obama and Hillary Clinton most definitely signaled to Islamic
State leaders that they had no intention of seriously challenging them, or even
of calling radical Islamic terrorism by its name. Instead, Obama and Clinton
pulled our troops out of Iraq, drew and then quickly erased a red line in Syria
and tried to convince us that unverifiable pinpoint drone strikes (after leaflet
warnings) would win the war against the Islamic State.
All of this was enabled by a feckless establishment
The policies of Obama and Clinton have made the world
unstable and unsafe and created a world stage eerily similar to that of the
late 1930s. We could be on the precipice of international conflict like nothing
we have seen since World War II. Obama and Clinton are the Neville Chamberlains
of our time. The deal to make $150 billion available to Iran, the leading state
sponsor of terrorism in the world and a nation committed to the destruction of
Israel, clearing the way for Iran to become a nuclear power, reminds me of
Chamberlain’s deal with Hitler in 1938, when the British prime minister
declared “peace for our time.”
Domestically, Obama and Clinton have pushed to $19
trillion the debt that our children and grandchildren will somehow have to find
a way to repay. Even our noble law enforcement has been demonized by the Obama
administration, and anarchy is erupting in our cities.
Thank God we now have the opportunity to elect a strong
leader, one who is not afraid to call the enemy by its name and to take the
battle to that enemy if necessary.
We need fresh and bold leadership. Continuing the
policies of Obama and Clinton internationally and domestically would be the
definition of insanity: repeating the same mistakes over and over and expecting
a different result.
I chose to personally support Donald Trump for president
early on and referred to him as America’s blue-collar billionaire at the
Republican National Convention because of his love for ordinary Americans and
his kindness, generosity and bold leadership qualities. My family has grown to
love all of the Trumps because they are wonderful people willing to sacrifice
much for their country. The public perception of Trump that has been created by
the media is simply false.
We are at a crossroads where our first priority must be
saving our nation. We need a leader with qualities that resemble those of
Winston Churchill, and I believe that leader is Donald Trump. As Churchill did,
Trump possesses the resolve to put his country first and to never give up in a
world that is increasingly hostile to our values.
Despite our differences, Americans from all walks of life
must unite behind Trump and Indiana Gov. Mike Pence or suffer dire
consequences. If Clinton appoints the next few Supreme Court justices, not only
will the Second Amendment right to bear arms be effectively lost, but also
activist judges will rewrite our Constitution in ways that would make it
unrecognizable to our founders.
And this country will have as its president a person who
jeopardized our national security by negligently sending and receiving
classified emails on a private server and then repeatedly making inaccurate
statements about it, all while her family’s foundation accepted millions of
dollars in donations from foreign countries. Will time reveal the quid pro quo?
Our nation’s future truly hangs in the balance.
Republicans such as Sen. Susan Collins (Maine) need to stop whining about
Trump’s temperament and start focusing on Clinton’s corruption. (As far as I am
concerned, the credibility of anyone who ignores Clinton’s temperament while
attacking Trump’s is suspect anyhow.) It is naïve or deceptive for conservatives
to claim that a write-in vote or a third-party vote will not benefit Clinton.
A vote for Donald Trump and Mike Pence is a vote for more
freedom and less government, a vote for national security and responsible
immigration policy, a vote to finally fight radical Islamic terrorism. It is a
vote to rebuild America’s respect overseas and a vote for
strict-constructionist and pro-life Supreme Court justices. Remember when Iran
held American hostages for 444 days, only to release them the day Ronald Reagan
took office? Expect those kinds of results under Donald Trump’s leadership.
FULL SPEECH: Donald Trump in battleground North Carolina
By The Hill staff
Thank you. It’s great to be here in Charlotte. I just met
with our many amazing employees right up the road at our property.
I’d like to take a moment to talk about the heartbreak
and devastation in Louisiana, a state that is very special to me.
We are one nation. When one state hurts, we all hurt –
and we must all work together to lift each other up. Working, building,
Our prayers are with the families who have lost loved
ones, and we send them our deepest condolences. Though words cannot express the
sadness one feels at times like this, I hope everyone in Louisiana knows that
our country is praying for them and standing with them to help them in these
We are one country, one people, and we will have together
one great future.
Tonight, I’d like to talk about the New American Future
we are going to create together.
Last week, I laid out my plan to bring jobs back to our
On Monday, I laid out my plan to defeat Radical Islamic
On Tuesday, in Wisconsin, I talked about how we are going
to restore law and order to this country.
Let me take this opportunity to extend our thanks and our
gratitude to the police and law enforcement officers in this country who have
sacrificed so greatly in these difficult times.
The chaos and violence on our streets, and the assaults
on law enforcement, are an attack against all peaceful citizens. If I am
elected President, this chaos and violence will end – and it will end very
Every single citizen in our land has a right to live in
To be one united nation, we must protect all of our
people. But we must also provide opportunities for all of our people.
We cannot make America Great Again if we leave any
Nearly Four in ten African-American children are living
in poverty. I will not rest until children of every color in this country are
fully included in the American Dream.
Jobs, safety, opportunity. Fair and equal representation.
This is what I promise to African-Americans, Hispanic-Americans, and all
But to achieve this New American Future we must break
from the failures of the past.
As you know, I am not a politician. I have worked in
business, creating jobs and rebuilding neighborhoods my entire adult life. I’ve
never wanted to learn the language of the insiders, and I’ve never been
politically correct – it takes far too much time, and can often make more
Sometimes, in the heat of debate and speaking on a
multitude of issues, you don’t choose the right words or you say the wrong
thing. I have done that, and I regret it, particularly where it may have caused
personal pain. Too much is at stake for us to be consumed with these issues.
But one thing I can promise you is this: I will always
tell you the truth.
I speak the truth for all of you, and for everyone in
this country who doesn’t have a voice.
I speak the truth on behalf of the factory worker who
lost his or her job.
I speak the truth on behalf of the Veteran who has been
denied the medical care they need – and so many are not making it. They are
I speak the truth on behalf of the family living near the
border that deserves to be safe in their own country but is instead living with
no security at all.
Our campaign is about representing the great majority of
Americans – Republicans, Democrats, Independents, Conservatives and Liberals –
who read the newspaper, or turn on the TV, and don’t hear anyone speaking for
them. All they hear are insiders fighting for insiders.
These are the forgotten men and women in our society, and
they are angry at so much on so many levels. The poverty, the unemployment, the
failing schools, the jobs moving to other countries.
I am fighting for these forgotten Americans.
Fourteen months ago, I declared my campaign for the
Presidency on the promise to give our government back to the people. Every day
since then, I’ve worked to repay the loyalty and the faith that you have put in
Every day I think about how much is at stake for this
country. This isn’t just the fight of my life, it’s the fight of our lives –
together – to save our country.
I refuse to let another generation of American children
be excluded from the American Dream. Our whole country loses when young people
of limitless potential are denied the opportunity to contribute their talents
because we failed to provide them the opportunities they deserved. Let our
children be dreamers too.
Our whole country loses every time a kid doesn’t graduate
from high school, or fails to enter the workforce or, worse still, is lost to
the dreadful world of drugs and crime.
When I look at the failing schools, the terrible trade
deals, and the infrastructure crumbling in our inner cities, I know all of this
can be fixed - and it can be fixed very quickly.
In the world I come from, if something is broken, you fix
If something isn’t working, you replace it.
If a product doesn’t deliver, you make a change.
I have no patience for injustice, no tolerance for
government incompetence, no sympathy for leaders who fail their citizens.
That’s why I am running: to end the decades of bitter
failure and to offer the American people a new future of honesty, justice and
opportunity. A future where America, and its people, always – and I mean always
– come first.
Aren’t you tired of a system that gets rich at your
Aren’t you tired of the same old lies and the same old
broken promises? And Hillary Clinton has proven to be one of the greatest liars
of all time.
Aren’t you tired of arrogant leaders who look down on
you, instead of serving and protecting you?
That is all about to change – and it’s about to change
soon. We are going to put the American people first again.
I’ve travelled all across this country laying out my bold
and modern agenda for change.
In this journey, I will never lie to you. I will never
tell you something I do not believe. I will never put anyone’s interests ahead
And, I will never, ever stop fighting for you.
I have no special interest. I am spending millions of
dollars on my own campaign – nobody else is.
My only interest is the American people.
So while sometimes I can be too honest, Hillary Clinton
is the exact opposite: she never tells the truth. One lie after another, and
getting worse each passing day.
The American people are still waiting for Hillary Clinton
to apologize for all of the many lies she’s told to them, and the many times
she’s betrayed them.
Tell me, has Hillary Clinton ever apologized for lying
about her illegal email server and deleting 33,000 emails?
Has Hillary Clinton apologized for turning the State
Department into a pay-for-play operation where favors are sold to the highest
Has she apologized for lying to the families who lost
loved ones at Benghazi?
Has she apologized for putting Iran on the path to
Has she apologized for Iraq? For Libya? For Syria? Has
she apologized for unleashing ISIS across the world?
Has Hillary Clinton apologized for the decisions she made
that have led to so much death, destruction and terrorism?
Speaking of lies, we now know from the State Department
announcement that President Obama lied about the $400 million dollars in cash
that was flown to Iran. He denied it was for the hostages, but it was. He said
we don’t pay ransom, but he did. He lied about the hostages – openly and
blatantly – just like he lied about Obamacare.
Now the Administration has put every American travelling
overseas, including our military personnel, at greater risk of being kidnapped.
Hillary Clinton owns President Obama’s Iran policy, one more reason she can
never be allowed to be President.
Let’s talk about the economy. Here, in this beautiful
state, so many people have suffered because of NAFTA. Bill Clinton signed the
deal, and Hillary Clinton supported it. North Carolina has lost nearly half of
its manufacturing jobs since NAFTA went into effect.
Bill Clinton also put China into the World Trade
Organization – another Hillary Clinton-backed deal. Your city of Charlotte has
lost 1 in 4 manufacturing jobs since China joined the WTO, and many of these
jobs were lost while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State – our chief
diplomat with China. She was a disaster, totally unfit for the job.
Hillary Clinton owes the State of North Carolina a very
big apology, and I think you’ll get that apology around the same time you’ll
get to see her 33,000 deleted emails.
Another major issue in this campaign has been the border.
Our open border has allowed drugs and crime and gangs to pour into our
communities. So much needless suffering, so much preventable death. I’ve spent
time with the families of wonderful Americans whose loved ones were killed by
the open borders and Sanctuary Cities that Hillary Clinton supports.
I’ve embraced the crying parents who’ve lost their
children to violence spilling across our border. Parents like Laura Wilkerson
and Michelle Root and Sabine Durden and Jamiel Shaw whose children were killed
by illegal immigrants.
My opponent supports Sanctuary Cities.
But where was the Sanctuary for Kate Steinle? Where was
the Sanctuary for the children of Laura, Michelle, Sabine and Jamiel?
Where was the Sanctuary for every other parent who has
suffered so horribly?
These moms and dads don’t get a lot of consideration from
our politicians. They certainly don’t get apologies. They’ll never even get the
time of day from Hillary Clinton.
But they will always come first to me.
Listen closely: we will deliver justice for all of these
American Families. We will create a system of immigration that makes us all
Hillary Clinton’s mistakes destroy innocent lives,
sacrifice national security, and betray the working families of this country.
Please remember this: I will never put personal profit
before national security. I will never leave our border open to appease donors
and special interests. I will never support a trade deal that kills American
jobs. I will never put the special interests before the national interest. I
will never put a donor before a voter, or a lobbyist before a citizen.
Instead, I will be a champion for the people.
The establishment media doesn’t cover what really matters
in this country, or what’s really going on in people’s lives. They will take
words of mine out of context and spend a week obsessing over every single
syllable, and then pretend to discover some hidden meaning in what I said.
Just imagine for a second if the media spent this energy
holding the politicians accountable who got innocent Americans like Kate
Steinle killed – she was gunned down by an illegal immigrant who had been
deported five times.
Just imagine if the media spent this much time
investigating the poverty and joblessness in our inner cities.
Just think about how much different things would be if
the media in this country sent their cameras to our border, or to our closing
factories, or to our failing schools. Or if the media focused on what dark
secrets must be hidden in the 33,000 emails Hillary Clinton deleted.
Instead, every story is told from the perspective of the
insiders. It’s the narrative of the people who rigged the system, never the
voice of the people it’s been rigged against.
So many people suffering in silence. No cameras, no
coverage, no outrage from a media class that seems to get outraged over just
about everything else.
So again, it’s not about me. It’s never been about me.
It’s about all the people in this country who don’t have a voice.
I am running to be their voice.
I am running to be the voice for every forgotten part of
this country that has been waiting and hoping for a better future.
I am glad that I make the powerful a little uncomfortable
now and again – including some powerful people in my own party. Because it
means I am fighting for real change.
There’s a reason the hedge fund managers, the financial
lobbyists, the Wall Street investors, are throwing their money at Hillary
Clinton. Because they know she will make sure the system stays rigged in their
It’s the powerful protecting the powerful.
The insiders fighting for the insiders.
I am fighting for you.
Here is the change I propose.
On terrorism, we are going to end the era of
nation-building and instead focus on destroying ISIS and Radical Islamic
We will use military, cyber and financial warfare and
work with any partner in the world, and the Middle East, that shares our goal
of defeating terrorism. I have a message for the terrorists trying to kill our
citizens: we will find you, we will destroy you, and we will win.
On immigration, we will temporarily suspend immigration
from any place where adequate screening cannot be performed. All applicants for
immigration will be vetted for ties to radical ideology, and we will screen out
anyone who doesn’t share our values and love our people. Anyone who believes
Sharia law supplants American law will not be given an immigrant visa. If you
want to join our society, then you must embrace our society, our values and our
tolerant way of life. Those who believe in oppressing women, gays, Hispanics,
African-Americans and people of different faiths are not welcome to join our
We will promote our America values, our American way of
life, and our American system of government which are all the best in the
My opponent on the other hand wants a 550% increase in
Syrian refugees. Her plan would bring in roughly 620,000 refugees from all
refugee-sending nations in her first term, on top of all other immigration.
Hillary Clinton is running to be America’s Angela Merkel, and we’ve seen how
much crime and how many problems that’s caused the German people.
We have enough problems already, we don’t need another
On crime, we are going to add more police, more
investigators, and appoint the best judges and prosecutors in the world. We
will pursue strong enforcement of federal laws.
The gangs and cartels and criminal syndicates terrorizing
our people will be stripped apart one by one. Their day is over.
On trade, we are going to renegotiate NAFTA, withdraw
from the TPP, stand up to China on our terrible trade agreement, and protect
every last American job.
Hillary Clinton has supported all of the major trade
deals that have stripped this country of its jobs and its wealth.
On taxes, we are going to massively cut tax rates for
workers and small businesses – creating millions of new good paying jobs.
We are going to get rid of regulations that send jobs
overseas and we are going to make it easier for young Americans to get the
credit they need to start a small business and pursue their dreams.
On education, we are going to give students choice, and
allow charter schools to thrive. We are going to end tenure policies that
reward bad teachers and hurt good ones. My opponent wants to deny students
choice and opportunity, all to get a little bit more money from the education
bureaucracy. She doesn’t care how many young dreams are dashed in the process.
We are going to work closely with African-American
parents and students in the inner cities – and what a big difference that will
make. This means a lot to me, and it is going to be a top priority in a Trump
On healthcare, we are going to repeal and replace
Obamacare. Countless Americans have been forced into part-time jobs, premiums
are about to jump by double-digits yet again, and just this week Aetna
announced it is pulling out of the exchanges in North Carolina. We are going to
replace this disaster with reforms that give you choice and freedom and control
in healthcare – at a much lower cost.
On political corruption, we are going to restore honor to
In my Administration, I am going to enforce all laws
concerning the protection of classified information. No one will be above the
I am going to forbid senior officials from trading favors
for cash by preventing them from collecting lavish speaking fees through their
spouses when they serve.
I am going to ask my senior officials to sign an
agreement not to accept speaking fees from corporations with a registered
lobbyist for five years after leaving office, or from any entity tied to a
Finally, we are going to bring this country together. We
are going to do it by emphasizing what we all have in common as Americans. We
are going to reject the bigotry of Hillary Clinton, which sees communities of
color only as votes and not as human beings worthy of a better future.
If African-American voters give Donald Trump a chance by
giving me their vote, the result for them will be amazing. Look at how badly
things are going under decades of Democratic leadership – look at the schools,
look at the 58% of young African-Americans not working. It is time for change.
What do you have to lose by trying something new? – I
will fix it. This means so much to me, and I will work as hard as I can to
bring new opportunity to places in our country which have not known opportunity
in a very long time.
Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party have taken
African-American votes totally for granted. Because the votes have been
automatically there, there has been no reason for Democrats to produce.
It is time to break with the failures of the past, and to
fight for every last American child in this country to have the better future
In my Administration, every American will be treated
equally, protected equally, and honored equally. We will reject bigotry and
hatred and oppression in all of its forms, and seek a new future built on our
common culture and values as one American people.
This is the change I am promising all of you: an honest
government, a fair economy, and a just society for each and every American.
But we can never fix our problems by relying on the same
politicians who created these problems in the first place.
72% of voters say our country is on the wrong track. I am
the change candidate, Hillary Clinton is the failed status quo.
It is time to vote for a New American Future.
Together, We Will Make America Strong Again.
We Will Make American Proud Again.
We Will Make America Safe Again.
Friends and fellow citizens: Come November, We Will Make
America Great Again.