Monday, August 27, 2018

Democratic Party Racism and Fascism Exposed: Death of a Nation 2018 - The Movie







Not since 1860 have the Democrats so fanatically refused to accept the result of a free election. 

That year, their target was Lincoln.

They smeared him.

They went to war to defeat him.

In the end, they assassinated him.

Now the target of the Democrats is President Trump and his supporters.

The Left calls them racists, white supremacists and fascists.

These charges are used to justify driving Trump from office and discrediting the right "by any means necessary."

But which is the party of the slave plantation?

Which is the party that invented white supremacy?

Which is the party that praised fascist dictators and shaped their genocidal policies and was in turn praised by them?

Moreover, which is the party of racism today?

Is fascism now institutionally embodied on the right or on the left?

Through stunning historical recreations and a searching examination of fascism and white supremacy, Death of a Nation cuts through progressive big lies to expose hidden history and explosive truths.

Lincoln united his party and saved America from the Democrats for the first time.

Can Trump-and we-come together and save America for the second time?




Wednesday, August 22, 2018

FLASHBACK: Remember When Obama Campaign Was Fined $375,000 for Campaign Reporting Violations AND NO JAIL TIME?


By Jim Hoft


On Tuesday, Trump’s former personal attorney Michael Cohen surrendered himself to the FBI after it was reported he reached a plea deal with federal prosecutors.

Michael Cohen admitted he violated campaign finance laws in relation to the Stormy Daniels payment at direction of a ‘candidate.’

He paid off the porn star over $100,000 in a hush money agreement which she later violated.

Democrats and their liberal media cheered that this was the end of the Trump “regime.”

But it wasn’t that long ago that a presidential campaign was charged with much worse.

In 2013 Maggie Haberman at Politico reported on the criminal campaign reporting violations against the Obama campaign.

According to the Politico the Obama campaign was fined $375,000.



President Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign was fined $375,000 by the Federal Election Commission for campaign reporting violations — one of the largest fees ever levied against a presidential campaign, POLITICO has learned.

The fine — laid out in detail in FEC documents that have yet to be made public — arose from an audit of the campaign, which was published in April.

Monday, August 20, 2018

Trump is gaining black support because his policies are improving the lives of all Americans


By Jason D. Meister | FOX News


President Trump is delivering better economic news for black Americans, Hispanics and women than any other president in the past century. 

That’s bad news for Democrats, who are counting on strong support from all three groups in the midterm elections.

Under President Obama, from 2009 to 2015 the incomes of black Americans fell by more than $900 per family, adjusted for inflation.

According to Sentier Research, when President Obama left office the median household income for all Americans was $58,056. Under President Trump, the rising tide of median household incomes rose to $62,175 by June – a jump of more than $4,000. And income for black Americans has been lifted as well.

Under President Trump, black employment has grown by an average of nearly 40,000 each month. In January 2017, the black unemployment rate stood at 7.8 percent. It’s now at 6.6 percent.

The number of black Americans with a job has risen by 708,000 from last year. Not only are black wages and incomes up since the election of Donald Trump – black employment has repeatedly hit historic highs. 

And it isn’t just black Americans who owe President Trump a vote of thanks. Employment among Hispanics and among women – even those with only a high school diploma – has hit the same kind of record-breaking highs.

Not surprisingly, the response from President Trump’s critics has been more of the same – tired identity politics. But it looks like the minority groups themselves are getting as tired of identity politics as the majority.

The latest poll report from the NAACP spares no effort to join in calling Trump racist, but the numbers tell a different story.

Trump won barely 8 percent of the black vote in 2016. Yet today the NAACP’s own polls show his approval rating among African-Americans standing almost three times as high, at 21 percent.

Rasmussen – the polling organization that came closest to calling the 2016 presidential election results – polls a wider and less politicized community. It announced on Twitter that black approval for Trump is now 36 percent – if not higher.

Black conservative commentator Candace Owens cites a poll where approval of President Trump among black Americans soars to 39 percent.

It’s not only poll numbers that reflect the trend. Some of the most notable figures in the black community – from Kanye West to Kim Kardashian to Dennis Rodman – have defied media criticism and come out as pro-Trump.

At a White House faith meeting on prison reform hosted by President Trump, Pastor Darrell Scott called Trump the "most pro-black president I've seen in my lifetime.”

According to a Reuters poll, after Kanye West sent out a series of tweets voicing support for Trump, black community approval jumped from 11 percent to 22 percent in April. The vocal support from black community leaders is making a huge difference. And it isn’t stopping.

President Trump has unlocked the bolt the Democrats had on the minority voter. I don’t see how you can interpret the numbers any other way.

If the minority vote continues to move even slightly more in the direction of President Trump and the Republicans, it will signal a historic tectonic shift – one that could give political dominance to the GOP for decades. Maybe generations.

These poll numbers are painting a picture that could change the future of American politics.

What's driving this change? Results.

It’s the same with women. The media tell the public that Trump treats women badly. But what the public sees is a president who has appointed more women to senior-level positions than any president in history. 

The American people see President Trump elevating Nikki Haley to become our ambassador to the U.N., Sarah Sanders to become White House press secretary, and Gina Haspel to become CIA director – to cite just a few examples. Yet Democrats and liberals attack and demean these same women.

Yes, black lives do matter. So do black polling numbers. But what matters most is making concrete and measurable improvements to the lives of black Americans, other minority Americans, women and everyone else in our country.

The Democratic approach has been verbal flattery and fiscal irresponsibility. President Clinton famously said to minorities, “I feel your pain.” President Obama promised hope and change – but failed to deliver.

President Trump is delivering and stopping the pain. Is it any surprise his poll numbers are turning around?

What is it about President Trump’s approach that has managed to succeed where President Obama and entire generations of liberals have failed?

Politicians talk the talk. Businessmen walk the walk.

Former law professors like Barack Obama may finesse arguments and make speeches in classrooms for the elite, but New York real estate entrepreneurs like Donald Trump work in the real world. They negotiate deals, work with contractors, listen to tenant complaints and grapple with regulations.

When you spend a lifetime meeting real-world deadlines, satisfying actual customers, building walls and ceilings that don’t fall down, paying vendors and employees and the tax collector, you don’t have time for identity politics.

In business you hire the best person for the job and together you meet the deadline. If you don’t, you lose the job and soon you don’t have a business.

President Trump isn’t an ideologue. He’s a pragmatist and a problem solver. He isn't interested in policy wonk theatrics. He just wants to get the job done. As a result, he has turned the Republican Party from the Traditionalist Party into the Pragmatic Party: the party that gets results. Because of him, the minority revolution has begun.

Jason D. Meister is an Advisory Board Member of Donald J. Trump for President. Visit him on Twitter: @jason_meister 


Wednesday, August 15, 2018

Trump Only Became A Racist When He Ran For President As A Republican


Commentary

By Frances Rice


Highly informative is Raynard Jackson’s article:  “Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and Oprah Winfrey Ignored Trump’s “Racism” for Decades. What Really Changed?”

In his article, Raynard points out that “Black folks like Rev. Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, and Oprah Winfrey, who now want to brand Trump as a racist, didn’t seem to mind associating with the “Apprentice” star when he just owned casinos and restaurants.”



Click here to view a video where Jesse Jackson praises and thanks Donald Trump for a lifetime of service to African Americans.

Raynard’s article provides details about how Trump has always been supportive of black people. 

Below  are the salient facts included in his article. To read the entire article, click here.


“For decades, Trump has been the toast of New York City elites and the media has always clamored to get interviews with Trump. Anyone who spends time in the Big Apple knows that stories about Trump sell newspapers and his TV interviews garner epic ratings.

"Even before Trump opened his hotels in Atlantic City, N.J., both ordinary people and celebrities would line up to get pictures with Trump; the real estate tycoon would parade very influential and aspiring politicians into his office and have them grovel for his support and money; and they were happy to do it, especially if there was a news crew around.





"They had mutual business dealings together that seemed to be based on each of their personal agendas. They each had something that the other wanted and needed and struck deals based on this set of mutual interests.

"Trump both raised funds and contributed thousands of dollars to Sharpton-backed causes over the years according to National Review.



"These Black folks who now want to brand Trump as a racist didn’t seem to mind associating with him when he owned casinos; when he was one of the biggest boxing promoters in the world; when he flew them around on his private jets and helicopters, or when he invited them to appear on his “Apprentice” TV show.

"So, the question that I ask Black America and White liberals is this: When did Donald Trump suddenly become a racist? 

"Before he entered the world of politics, he was branded as the life of the party; now that he is president, he is being branded as a racist.

"What gives here?

"Bill and Hillary Clinton were personal guests at Trump’s wedding to Melania in 2005 at Mar-a-Lago, Trump’s private members-only club in Palm Beach, Fla. Other notables at Trump’s wedding were: Shaquille O’Neal, Anna Wintour, Simon Cowell, Kelly Ripa, Katie Couric, and Russell Simmons.

"For a racist, Trump seems to have a very eclectic group of friends from all walks of life.

"An interesting point of fact is that Mar-a-Lago is located in Palm Beach, Florida, one of the wealthiest communities in the United States. Two of Mar-a-Lago’s competitors—the Palm Beach Bath and Tennis Club and The Everglades Club—have notoriously refused to admit Blacks. 



"In comparison, according to a Complex.com article on the “25 Most Outrageously Exclusive Social Clubs in America” Trump’s Mar-a-lago club, doesn’t discriminate against anyone who can afford the $150,000 initiation fee and $7,000 in annual dues.

"The Wall Street Journal reported that, in 1996, “Trump filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court in Palm Beach, alleging that the town was discriminating against Mar-a-Lago, in part because it is open to Jews and African Americans.”


"To those who are instinctively going to disagree with this column, please answer my simple question: When did Trump become a racist?"

Tuesday, August 14, 2018

Minorities Are Winning Under President Trump



President Trump Has Fought For All Americans To Have Better Job Opportunities, Access To Healthcare, And Overall Quality Of Life



President Trump has fostered a roaring economy for all Americans, driving down unemployment rates for minority groups, with African American, Asian, and Hispanic unemployment hitting near record lows in recent months.

Under President Obama, African American unemployment was on average 5.2 percent higher than the general population, and Hispanic unemployment averaged 1.9 percent higher.

Under President Trump, not only has minority unemployment plummeted, but the unemployment gap has narrowed to 3 percent for African Americans, and 0.8 percent for Hispanics.

President Trump has focused on providing jobs training programs that help Americans who can’t afford a college education earn money while they learn.

President Trump has been an avid advocate of prison reform, supporting The First Step Act, sentencing reforms, and hosting a Prison Reform Summit where he sought input from over 100 activists, experts and policymakers.

In an effort to promote the growth of Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), President Trump has increased funding for various HBCU programs.

Under President Trump, technical education and vocational studies, programs that are heavily utilized by minorities, have received $1.2 billion in funding.

Under President Trump, Obamacare’s harmful and costly individual mandate has been repealed and access to Short-Term Limited-Duration plans has been expanded in order to provide more affordable healthcare plans to the American people.

Premiums for these plans can be up to 80 percent lower than Obamacare healthcare plans.

STLD plans can offer more affordable healthcare options for minorities.

Saturday, August 11, 2018

Voter ID Law Had No ‘Suppression’ Impact on Black Americans in Recent Alabama Election


By John Binder

Alabama’s voter ID laws had no suppression impact on black American turnout in the state’s most recent Senate election.

Despite constant accusations from organizations funded by billionaire George Soros and Democrats that laws mandating voters show ID ahead of casting a ballot suppress minority turnout, the most recent case in Alabama seemingly debunks this theory.

In the Alabama  Senate runoff election in late 2017 — where Roy Moore and Doug Jones fought to take Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ former seat — black Americans turned out in droves to push Jones over the edge to win the election, even as the state had implemented a new voter ID law.

The New York Times admitted in a report that the high black American voter turnout in Alabama “complicates” the claim by leftist advocacy groups and Democrats that voter ID laws keep black Americans from getting out to vote.

The New York Times admitted in 2017 that voter ID laws did not suppress the votes of black Americans in Alabama’s most recent election.

A similar report by Courthouse News noted how despite claims that Alabama’s voter ID laws would suppress black American voter turnout, the opposite occurred on election day:

Jones was carried to victory by black voters who turned up on the clear December day in numbers higher than expected. According to exit polling conducted by CNN, black voters overwhelmingly supported Jones, with 98 percent of black women voting for him. [Emphasis added]

Twenty-nine percent of voters in the Alabama special election were black, according to CNN, at a time when they make up about 26 percent of Alabama’s population. While one in four people in Alabama are black, one out of every three voters in line Tuesday deciding the race between Moore and Jones was African-American. [Emphasis added]

In his newest book titled Fraud: How the Left Plans to Steal the Next Election, Government Accountability Institute (GAI) research director Eric Eggers told Breitbart News in an exclusive interview that “the Democrat political machine is built in part on the reliance of illegal votes cast by demographics that vote reliably for Democrats.”

This “political machine,” as Eggers describes, is partly committed to stopping voter ID laws with accusations of racism and voter suppression, despite there being no evidence supporting these claims, he says.

John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter at @JxhnBinder

Friday, August 10, 2018

The Myth of American Inequality


By Phil Gramm and John F. Early | The Wall Street Journal  


Taxes and transfers in the U.S. put its income distribution in line with its large developed peers.


America is the world’s most prosperous large country, but critics often attempt to tarnish that title by claiming income is distributed less equally in the U.S. than in other developed countries.

These critics point to data from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, which ranks the U.S. as the least equal of the seven largest developed countries.

American progressives often weaponize statistics like these to urge greater redistribution.

But the OECD income-distribution comparison is biased because the U.S. underreports its income transfers in comparison to other nations.

When the data are adjusted to account for all government programs that transfer income, the U.S. is shown to have an income distribution that aligns closely with its peers.

The OECD measures inequality by determining a country’s “Gini coefficient,” or the proportion of all income that would have to be redistributed to achieve perfect equality.

A nation’s Gini coefficient would be 0 if every household had the same amount of disposable income, and it would approach 1 if a single household had all of the disposable income.

The current OECD comparison, portrayed by the blue bars in the nearby chart, shows Gini coefficients for the world’s most-developed large countries, ranging from 0.29 in Germany to 0.39 in the U.S.

How Unequal?Gini Coefficient, adjusted disposable incomeSource: OECD, authors

But there are variations in how each nation reports income. The U.S. deviates significantly from the norm by excluding several large government transfers to low-income households.

Inexplicably, the Census Bureau excludes Medicare and Medicaid, which redistribute more than $760 billion a year to the bottom 40% of American households. The data also exclude 93 other federal redistribution programs that annually transfer some $520 billion to low-income households.

These include the Children’s Health Insurance Program, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children. States and localities directly fund another $310 billion in redistribution programs also excluded from the Census Bureau’s submission.

This means current OECD comparisons omit about $1.6 trillion in annual redistributions to low-income Americans—close to 80% of their total redistribution receipts. This significantly skews the U.S. Gini coefficient.


The correct Gini should be 0.32—not 0.39. That puts the U.S. income distribution in the middle of the seven largest developed nations—the red bar on the chart.

Gini scores for other countries in the OECD ranking also might shift with better data: The OECD doesn’t publish transfers by income level for other countries. But the change in income distribution for other countries would likely be less drastic.

The poorest fifth of U.S. households receive 84.2% of their disposable income from taxpayer-funded transfers, and the second quintile gets 57.8%. U.S. transfer payments constitute 28.5% of Americans’ disposable income—almost double the 15% reported by the Census Bureau.

That’s a bigger share than in all large developed countries other than France, which redistributes 33.1% of its disposable income.

The U.S. also has the most progressive income taxes of its peer group.
The top 10% of U.S. households earn about 33.5% of all income, but they pay 45.1% of income taxes, including Social Security and Medicare taxes.


Their share of all income-related taxes is 1.35 times as large as their share of income. In Germany, the top 10% pay 1.07 times their share of earnings. The top 10% of French pay 1.1 times their share.

If the top earners pay smaller shares of income taxes in other countries, everybody else pays more.

The bottom 90% of German earners pay a share of their nation’s tax
es on income 77% larger than that paid by the bottom 90% of Americans. 

The bottom 90% in France pay nearly double the share their American counterparts pay.

Even in Sweden—the supposed progressive utopia—the top 10% of earners pay only 5.9% of gross domestic product in income-related taxes, 22% less than their American peers. 

The bottom 90% of Swedes pay 16.3% of GDP in taxes on income, 77% more than in the U.S.

Even these numbers understate how progressive the total tax burden is in America

The U.S. has no value-added tax and collects only 35.8% of all tax revenues from non-income-tax sources, the smallest share of any OECD country.

Most developed countries have large VATs and collect a far larger share of their state revenue through regressive levies.

When all transfer payments and taxes are counted, the U.S. redistributes a larger share of its disposable income than any country other than France. 

Relative to the share of income they earn, the share of income taxes paid by America’s high earners is greater than the share of income taxes paid by their peers in any other OECD country.

The progressive dream of an America with massive income redistribution and a highly progressive tax system has already come true. 

To make America even more like Europe, these dreamers will have to redefine middle-income Americans as “rich” and then double their taxes.

Mr. Gramm, a former chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, is a visiting scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. Mr. Early served twice as assistant commissioner at the Bureau of Labor Statistics and is president of Vital Few LLC.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-myth-of-american-inequality-1533855113?mod=hp_opin_pos2

Wednesday, August 08, 2018

Black Lives Still Don't Matter in Sanctuary City Chicago


By Clarence McKee | Newsmax


Chicago Police Superintendent Eddie Johnson listens as Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel speaks about Chicago's weekend of gun violence during a news conference at the Chicago Police Department 6th District station August 6, 2018 in Chicago, Illinois. Chicago experienced one of it's most violent weekends of the year, after more then 70 people were shot, with 12 fatalities. (Joshua Lott/Getty Images

As I wrote in this space on October 15, 2015, in an article entitled “Rahm Emanuel Is Failing Chicago,” “Chicago is America’s Afghanistan.”

Three years later, America’s version of the “Killing Fields” continues. According to the Chicago Tribune’s crime tracking team, as of August 6, 318 people have been killed and 1,785 have been shot this year alone. 

This past weekend, of the reported 74 gunshot victims, 14 were under 18 including two of the reported 12 killed — an 11 and 13-year-old.

Fox News political analyst Gianno Caldwell, who is black with family in Chicago, has been touched by the violence. He puts it in vivid perspective in his recent opinion article for Fox News:

“The gun and gang violence rampant in Chicago… is a daily, piercing threat. Bullets are indiscriminate, and the death toll has a crippling grip on Chicago’s black community that continually seeks help from state and local leaders — only to be met with more disappointment and yet another funeral… for black kids… going out to play in their own neighborhoods or even their own backyards may be a life and death decision.”

Caldwell is not some casual observer. To him, it’s personal.

During Memorial Day weekend last year, his younger brother was sitting in a car with friends on Chicago’s south side when two men fired 25 rounds into their car. His brother survived but his best friend died in his arms.

The political and media reaction to such violence is, of course, based on race and identity politics — the color of the skin of the perpetrators and their victims. Just look at the following example.

A white man shoots and kills a black man in a fight over a parking space in Clearwater, Florida. The Reverend Al Sharpton and all five Democratic candidates for Governor show up at a church rally protesting Florida’s Stand Your Ground Law.

The law was used by the local sheriff as a reason for not arresting the white shooter. Even Trump endorsed Republican Gubernatorial candidate Ron DeSantis — in a rare display of a Republican candidate appealing to black voters’ concerns — jumped into the controversy. He criticized the sheriff for misinterpreting the law saying he didn’t think he “analyzed the law properly."

In stark contrast, the reaction from national and local black and white Democrat officials to last weekend’s horrific violence has been deafening silence. It’s the same silence and “see no evil” reaction they have had to the outrageous ambush and harassment of Turning Point’s Charlie Kirk and Candace Owens outside a Philadelphia restaurant Monday by so-called anti-fascist "antifa" loyalists thugs — the Democrat Party’s new “Brown Shirts.”

The latest shooting rampage comes two years after Emanuel proclaimed in November 2016 that “you are safe in Chicago, you are secure in Chicago… Chicago has in the past been a sanctuary city. ... It always will be a sanctuary city…”

He was talking about illegal immigrants who feared a Trump crackdown. He sure wasn’t talking to blacks on the South and West sides of the city. For them, there is no sanctuary from violence!

Emanuel’s response to the weekend of blood and death: “There is a shortage of values about what is right, what is wrong…”

Is he kidding?

This is the same Rahm Emanuel who said in 2012 regarding the Chick-fil-A restaurant chain coming to Chicago: “Chick-fil-A’s values are not Chicago values. They’re not respectful of our residents, our neighbors and our family.”

My question is if Chick-fil-A’s Judeo-Christian values are not Chicago’s values, what values is he referring to?

Don’t expect Reverend Sharpton, Chicago’s own Reverend Jesse Jackson, or black and white national, state, and local politicians to show up at any rally to protest the mayhem, mourn the dead and condemn the killers.

Why? Because the shooters and their victims were black. 

Although the killers have not been identified, that is the prevailing thought given gang associations.

You can bet your boots that if these same black victims had been shot by a group of Charlottesville-like white supremacist marchers; or, if the protesters in Philadelphia had been wearing Trump hats and harassed a black couple, all hell would have broken loose.

Jackson, Sharpton, Black Lives Matter advocates, antifa, a scattering of entertainers and athletes as well as national and local politicians would have rushed in to protest the racist violence. 

You would probably see several of the 2020 presidential wannabees knocking themselves over getting to the nearest microphone and camera.

As I have previously written, based on their actions and reactions, to many on the left and their political allies, a black life in Chicago, Baltimore, and elsewhere has more value and gets much more attention if taken by a white than if by another black.

Caldwell’s solution and recommendation: “President Trump should direct Attorney General Jeff Sessions and FBI Director Chris Wray to come up with a comprehensive action plan to end Chicago’s status as a war zone.

I agree!

If the nation’s first black president Obama did not choose to do anything to deal with the genocide of blacks in his Democrat-controlled home town, maybe a white President Trump will.

Clarence V. McKee is president of McKee Communications, Inc., a government, political, and media relations consulting firm in Florida. He held several positions in the Reagan administration as well as in the Reagan presidential campaigns. He is a former co-owner of WTVT-TV in Tampa and former president of the Florida Association of Broadcasters. Read more of his reports — Go Here Now.

List of 700 Tax Reform Good News


By John Kartch | Americans For Tax Reform



Click here to view the interactive map of your state and see 700 examples of pay raises, bonuses, 401(k) match increases, expansions, benefit increases, and utility rate reductions due to the Republican tax cuts.








NOTE

25 most recently added items: 

Ole Smoky Distillery, SALUS, Clayton Distillery, Wood Boat Brewing, Crete Carrier Corporation, Puget Sound Energy Inc., Emerson Electric, Quad/Graphics, Kris-Tech Wire, Dollar Bank, Atlantic City Electric, Jamison Door, Bean Counter Farm, Sabel Steel, Fairfield Inn & Suites, Comfort Inn Slippery Rock, Comfort Inn Cambridge, Dry Fly Distilling, Big River Steel, Suffolk Construction, Control Automation Technologies, Pratt Industries, HT Metals, Metallix


Tuesday, August 07, 2018

Get It Through Your Head That Progressives Hate You


By Kurt Schlichter |Townhall


Some of you need to cease the denial and accept the harsh reality that the left hates you. 

It’s a fact, as much as the liberal gaslight gang and the conserva-sissy weakhearts deny it. 

You can tell that leftists hate you by the way that leftists tell you that they hate you.

Take Sarah Jeong, please – hey, the New York Times was happy to get this bitter creep onboard because of her history of virulent racism. 

The Times saw her hate as a plus, not a negative, an asset, not a liability. 

You can’t draw any other conclusion – if you take her tweets, trade out the word “white” – man, does she ever hate white people – and toss in some other skin hue you’d have a pink-haired millennial David Duke. 

And the NYT saw that and said, “Awesome, sign her up!”

You may think you know the deal about her prejudice, but you don’t really know the deal, not until you read the full extent of the Ku Klux Korean immigrant’s portfolio of bigoted tweetery

It’s not merely ugly, stupid, and immoral – it’s downright sociopathic. 

Yet the flagship of the floundering fleet that is America’s liberal media saw the iceberg and went full speed ahead.

We could go on about how if this was a conservative, he, she, or whatever the “groveling goblin” gender pronoun is, would be history, but we all know there is a double standard. 

What some of us have been unwilling to accept is why there is a double standard. 

Well, it’s because the people at the New York Times, and the liberal elite in general, agree with the hateful garbage Jeong and her pals dish out.

Progressives think that it’s okay to hate someone solely because of the color of his skin. 

They aren’t against racism – they are actively in favor of racism. 

Sure, they dress up their shameful prejudices with the kind of convoluted nonsense their associate professors of oppression studies taught them as sophomores, but it all comes down to the fact that they hate white people. 

Of course, they also hate black, Asian, and Latin people too, when such patriots dare embrace conservative values. So, in that way, liberals are equal opportunity racists.

Try this test: Ask a liberal, “Is it wrong to hate someone because of his race?”

Because we are not scumbag losers, we will answer, “Yes.” 

Liberals will give you a dissertation which eventually boils down to, “No.”

They hate us. They want us dead – just ask Sarah, who wants to “cancel white people,” which sure sounds murdery coming from an ideological heir to Mao, Stalin, and Castro. 

And apparently, we’re even more terrible because we actually listen to what they say and then dare to draw obvious conclusions. To libs, that’s racist.

We’re supposed to ignore what they say to our faces and instead imagine that these are nice people who wish only the best for us as they tell us to die.

The left can’t hide its contempt anymore. 

Some of them, like that pink-mopped Harvard bigot, don’t even try. 

And, as my upcoming book Militant Normals: How Regular Americans Are Rebelling Against the Elite to Reclaim Our Democracy points out, in brutal and hilarious detail, Normal people – that is, those of us of all shades of skin hue who refuse to buy into the liberal elite’s sickening racist dogma – tend to take elitists telling them they hate them pretty seriously.

You want to know why we got Trump? Sarah Jeong and her dopey ilk are why we got Trump, and I am thrilled that Jeong got this gig and I am delighted that her idiot pals think the best hill to die on right before the midterms is Mt. It’s-Cool-To-Hate-White-People.

Not the Fredocons though. Those saps. 

This is a golden opportunity to steal the ball and run up the score, but as usual, these useless goofs seem intent on fumbling. 

Count on them to fuss and whimper their way into submission when they should be taking the fight to the left. 

We’re supposed to not “join the mob” and generally give the left a free pass on this latest atrocity, just like we’re supposed to give them a free pass on every other atrocity we’ve endured. 

Well, hard pass on the free passes.

Leftists don’t get to pull this garbage and just get away with it. 

Cut the nonsense about “outrage mobs.” 

Regardless of the principles of True Conservatism™, it’s perfectly okay under actual conservative principles to protest the liberal elite’s public embrace of outright race-based hatred. 

Hell, it’s mandatory.

And this imbroglio is a perfect weapon for us, because it perfectly encapsulates our enemy’s hateful view of us in a way every midterm voter between the coasts is going to understand. 

We need to wield it like a sledgehammer in anticipation of the upcoming election.

You soft boys can pivot back to your “We’re better than that” pose and go AWOL, again, like you always do. 

But I say the Sarah Jeong/NYT love affair is a suppository, and I say we start curing the hemorrhoid that is liberalism by giving the left a double dose good and hard right up the progressive tract.

We need to accept the harsh reality that a substantial number of our fellow citizens hate our guts. All the simpering blabber about civility, all the clich├ęs about unity, are all just comforting lies. A bunch of them hate us.

They hate us. Hate

And we need to stop pretending the truth right in front of us is not right in front of us.

What do we do? 

We fight. 

This is not going to be a single skirmish. This is a campaign, a long and difficult one with the objective of destroying the ideological cancer metastasizing through America’s body politic. 

Step One: We must ruthlessly attack any manifestation of their hate using all the political and cultural tools at our disposal. 

We need to make liberal racism painful, so they are incentivized to abandon it. We’re not here to win moral victories. We’re here to win victory victories.

The stakes could not be higher. 

My novels People’s Republic and Indian Country show what will happen if we lose.

Spoiler: It involves camps, but not singin’ around the fire and roastin’ marshmallows camps.

Step Two: We must win elections. 

And yeah, you cruise-shilling Never Trump sissies, that means being all unseemly and gauche by going to the electorate and pointing out liberals’ disgusting acts of contempt against them, like the elevation of this Jeong twerp, and telling the American people the truth – that the elite hates them and that they must get militant and retaliate at the ballot box. 

Let’s make liberal elite’s racism against the majority of America an election issue. 

The Democrats are the party of hating white people (and non-white people who refuse to toe the liberal line). 

Let’s say so, because it is so

Yeah, I know it’ll give the bow-tie boyz the vapors, but it ain’t demagoguery if it’s true.

Step Three: Get your head right and keep your powder dry. 

We all want America to return to E Pluribus Unum and a consensus in favor of individual freedom, but we need to grow the hell up and accept that this might not happen without a struggle. 

Our enemies don’t want it to. 

You have seen the left adopt explicit racism as a core value. 

You have seen the attacks on our right to speak freely. 

You have seen the attacks on our right to worship freely. 

You have seen the attacks on our right to keep and bear arms. 

Do you imagine that once we give up our right to speak, to worship, and to protect ourselves and our liberty, that the racist Sarah Jeongs of the world, should they take power, will somehow suddenly stop hating us and be cool?

Chet the Unicorn might think so, but do you? 

Understand your enemy.

Know that he, she, or xe means you harm. 

Be ready to defend your life and your freedom by exercising your right to do so.

Luckily, it probably won’t come to that since the prog hipster militia can’t find skinny battle rigs or vinyl plates, and their chests would be too concave to lift AR-15s if they actually owned any.

You, however, should own several just in case the left tries to act on the hate they’ve demonstrated. 

Accept the awful truth that leftists hate you and act accordingly. 

Get woke. 

All you have to do is listen to the likes of Sarah Jeong and her pals at the New York Times – they will be happy to tell you what they really think.