By David Catron
Emerging
information from the states render his victory less and less plausible.
During the weeks following November 3, innumerable
election experts and statistical analysts have pored over the voting data upon
which former Vice President Joe Biden’s purported campaign victory ostensibly
stands. A growing body of evidence ranging from straightforward ballot audits
to complex quantitative analyses suggests that the tabulation of the votes was
characterized by enough chicanery to alter the outcome of the election.
Consequently, a consensus has gradually developed among the auditors of
publicly available information released by the states, and it contradicts
the narrative promulgated by the Democrats and the media. The more data experts
see, the less convinced they are that Biden won.
Among the analysts who question the legitimacy of Biden’s
victory is Dr. Navid Keshavarz-Nia, a cybersecurity expert whose technical
expertise was touted
by the New York Times last September and who has been described as a hero
in the Washington Monthly. It’s unlikely that either publication will be
singing his praises for his work pursuant to the recent election. His damning
analysis of the electronic manipulation of votes that occurred in the early
hours of November 4 appears in a sworn affidavit included with C.J. Pearson
v. Kemp, a lawsuit
filed by Attorney Sidney Powell in the U.S. District Court for the Northern
District of Georgia. His nine-page affidavit
(Exhibit 26) describes how it is possible to manipulate votes, where this
occurred, and sums up his findings as follows:
I conclude with high confidence that the election 2020
data were altered in all battleground states resulting in hundreds of thousands
of votes that were cast for President Trump to be transferred to Vice President
Biden. These alterations were the result of systemic and widespread exploitable
vulnerabilities in DVS, Scytl/SOE Software and Smartmatic systems that enabled
operators to achieve the desired results. In my view, the evidence is overwhelming
and incontrovertible.
Dr. Keshavarz-Nia is by no means the only expert to reach
the conclusion that widespread vote-tampering occurred. This examination
of the election results, for example, uses quantitative analysis to identify
some very odd anomalies in the 2020 vote patterns. But it isn’t necessary to be
a sophisticated statistician or cybersecurity expert possessed of arcane
knowledge of how voting machines operate to see that enough ballot fraud
occurred to change the election results in several states. That Keshavarz-Nia
provides his findings in a sworn affidavit, under penalty of perjury, renders
him highly credible. Still, his conclusions are rather opaque to anyone without
an enormous amount of training and experience in his field. This requires many
of us to take what he says on faith.
Bearing this in mind, Matt Braynard of the Voter
Integrity Project (VIP) approached the 2020 results in a far less arcane
fashion. His team analyzed publicly available data on absentee ballots, and he explained
his findings in a way that any intelligent voter can understand. VIP looked at
suspicious ballot activity in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania,
and Wisconsin. Among the most significant VIP findings involved people who
changed their state of residence, yet voted absentee using their prior address.
In Arizona, which Biden “won” by 10,457 votes, there were 19,997 questionable
votes. In Georgia, which Biden “won” by 12,670 votes, VIP found 138,221 such
votes. In Wisconsin, which Biden “won” by 20,608 votes, there were 26,673 such
votes. As Braynard told
the Epoch Times:
This election, it appears to me, has been decided by
ballots that are highly questionable.… I can give you the list of the people
who voted in this election, who filed National Change of Address cards in
Georgia, moving themselves to another state.… I can also show you the
subsequent state voter registrations of these individuals in other states, who
then cast absentee ballots back in Georgia.… I have no confidence that Joe
Biden is the deserved winner of this election.
Braynard has been asked to present the findings of the
Voter Integrity Project to Monday’s hearing
with members of Arizona’s legislature. Moreover, as Braynard tweeted
Friday, “The VIP findings have also been included in court filings in PA, GA,
MI, WI, and AZ, including declarations we collected.” Sunday, another tweet by
Braynard revealed that the FBI has proactively requested VIP findings that may
indicate illegal ballots. Meanwhile, no discussion of 2020 election
skulduggery is complete without a discussion of the Democrat precincts that
record more votes than registered voters. Rep. Bill Posey (R-Fla.) tweeted
the following on that perennial topic: “According to an affidavit in the MI
lawsuit, one Michigan precinct/twnship had 781.91% turnout. How does this
happen?”
Good question. No fewer than six precincts listed by Rep.
Posey experienced turnout exceeding 120 percent. Another 10 allegedly enjoyed
100 percent turnout. This is an insult to the electorate’s intelligence, and it
happened in Democrat precincts all across the nation. From World War II through
2016 average turnout in a presidential election was about 56 percent. Yet we
are expected to believe that, in 2020, the national turnout was 66 percent. It simply
does not pass the laugh test. This looks to be the result of widespread
Democrat chicanery facilitated by high-handed flouting of federal, state, and
county election laws. Joe Biden’s victory is no more legitimate than his
plagiarized rhetoric or working-class credentials. His Potemkin presidency
would be no more authentic than the man himself.
https://spectator.org/legitimacy-of-biden-win-buried-by-objective-data/