What really stinks is that Robert Mueller may very well be as squared away as people say he is, and it doesn’t matter. The guy is a Purple Heart, Bronze Star Marine, and not a soldier-trashing fraud like John Kerry either. He’s served his country and may be trying to do it again in the context of a fake scandal that has degenerated from “Trump made a pact with Putin BECAUSE TREASON!” to “Trump almost made Comey cry BECAUSE OBSTRUCTION!”
All that’s left of
Felonia von Pantsuit’s original lie, created to ease the searing pain of her
utter rejection, is the establishment’s wishcasting that Trump somehow
obstructed an investigation of nothing.
Regardless, I don’t want
to be cynical, though bitter experience compels it. I hope Mueller is as
honest as people keep saying he is. I hope he has the integrity people
keep telling me he has. I hope that not everyone who has ever held a
position of responsibility within the Beltway is an establishment agenda-driven
hack trying to squelch Trump and the voices of all those peons who voted for
him.
But hope isn’t enough.
The establishment is
praising Mueller up and down. They tell me he’s honest. They tell me he’s
incorruptible. But they also told me Jim Comey was a
towering paragon of virtue instead of a
towering pile of Harry Reid.
Everything else the
establishment tells us is a lie, so why not this? How has the establishment
earned our trust on Mueller when it has lied to our faces for decades?
The establishment
demands our trust, so it bears the burden of proving this isn’t just another
scam.
What, exactly, is the evidence that the fix is not already in,
that no matter what, Robert Mueller isn’t going to come out with some bunch of
nonsense and innuendo that will give the impeachment-addict Democrats and the
puff-boy Republicans, who don’t really want to drain the swamp they prosper in,
the green light to go along with the soft coup the establishment’s been
dreaming of?
Why should we believe
this isn’t rigged? Because people in D.C. promise us that “Hey, this guy is
honest?”
I guess we’re supposed
to think “Yeah, well this time they’ve got to be telling us the truth.
They’re totally due.”
But here’s the problem –
we now have lots of new facts that change the original picture of our esteemed
special counsel.
Yes, as the Democrat steno pool that is the media has pointed
out as we got woke to what’s happening, a lot of conservatives (including me)
were initially satisfied with Mueller when he was appointed to investigate the
Trump/Russia connection that everyone now admits doesn’t exist.
But then came
some troubling revelations which – whoa! – made us re-evaluate our prior
understanding. So we – brace yourselves! – changed our minds in the face
of new evidence.
Let’s look at all of the
evidence.
Mueller seems like a good guy. War hero. No scandals as FBI director.
Not a known scumbag or skeevy perv. In Washington terms, the last one alone
puts him miles ahead of the competition.
But now we find out that
he’s Leaky Jim Comey’s bestest buddy there ever was. These guys are pals, and
now Mueller is going to investigate the dude who fired his amigo? Does that
seem cool to you?
If the HR Department at
work is investigating you, do they pick as the lead investigator the guy you go
drink Budweiser with?
Sure they do, unless Chet the Unicorn is free, because
the only thing more unlikely than picking a key player in the investigation’s
friend to do it is picking a damn unicorn to do it.
So, Jim Comey – whose
hurt feelings seem to be the only thing left of this Schumer-show of a scandal
– is the key guy in the pseudo-scandal, and he’s got a motive to shaft the
president, yet his friend is investigating it and somehow that’s supposed to be
A-OK?
Didn’t Comey admit that
he leaked info after getting fired in order to get a special counsel appointed?
And didn’t Comey say he’s been meeting with Mueller and they’ve been chatting
it up secretly? Did Mueller read him his rights? Why not?
Sounds super
above-board.
And Comey says Mueller
is awesome. So do the Democrats.
I’m feeling pretty confident this isn’t
rigged.
What do you think, Chet the Unicorn?
What’s that, Chet?
You
have your doubts?
Bad, wicked, cynical unicorn, listening to fake news!
Oh, and it gets better.
My intrepid fellow Townhall columnist and friend Derek Hunter dug up the fact
that Mueller
did exactly the same thing as Trump is accused of doing with regard to the Waco
massacre. Of course, in the case, such as it is, of Flynn, no one
barbecued any children.
Hey, if someone accuses
me of a bogus non-crime (because what Honest Jim says Trump did is not remotely
a crime), can Derek investigate me? If not, why not?
But let’s put aside that
the pal of a potential perjurer is heading the investigation of something he
himself did.
Let’s look closer.
Hey, who’s helping Mueller out?
I bet it’s
another bunch of pros with no agenda we can put our confidence in because elite
insiders are incorruptible.
Well, Mueller’s hiring
some folks and their donation histories are on that helpful Federal Election
Commission web site.
Now guess what they are.
Go ahead. Guess.
Yeah, Mueller’s hiring a bunch of Democrat donors to investigate
Trump.
Well, luckily there’s so
little partisanship these days that this makes no difference, say the people
who support their party.
After all, these are public servants of impeccable
integrity and stuff who won’t let party get in the way of blah blah blah blah
blah blah.
Let me offer you a
complete list of non-conservatives who have stood up against this fascist witch
hunt and the Deliverance-esque canoe trip that liberals are taking with
the concept of justice:
Alan Dershowitz.
Jonathan Turley.
That is all.
Hmmm.
Nope, neither one
of them is on the Mueller Team.
What’s up with that?
But hey, I’m sure that a
president who has made a point of attacking the establishment will get a fair
shake from a special counsel who is as establishment as establishment comes and
who is a close friend of the main accuser and who heads a team that is composed
entirely of establishment Democrat donors.
Seems legit.
Well, D.C. legit.
Mueller needs to resign
– that’s what a guy with unimpeachable integrity does when he realizes his
personal relationships give the appearance of impropriety.
It’s also what someone
who conforms to the applicable regulation does.
That regulation is 28 CFR 45.2, and it
says that Justice Department employees cannot participate in a “criminal
investigation or prosecution if he has a personal or political relationship
with …Any person or organization substantially involved in the conduct that is
the subject of the investigation or prosecution.”
I hope this is merely
the appearance of impropriety, though that is enough to trigger the
regulation, and that this isn’t just another Deep State scam designed to
subjugate forever the half of the country that, in desperation, sent Donald
Trump to Washington to try and break the establishment’s death grip on power.
Because if this is a scam, we’re going to know it, and if they try to cancel
out our votes what follows is going to make my
recent novel’s dystopian vision of America torn apart look like Happy
Bunny Meets Fluffy Puppy at the Hugging Factory.
Mueller’s simply got to
go, because there’s simply no way they can satisfactorily answer the question,
“Why should we trust Robert Mueller?”
I don’t know him. You
probably don’t know him. All we know is he was a heroic Marine, which is a
plus, and which is frankly my only source of hope that he’s not just another
loathsome establishment tapeworm.
But he is also a
Washington insider, one who just happens to be besties with the guy his crew of
freaking Democrat donors would be fitting for an orange jumpsuit if this wasn’t
just another establishment okey doke.
Worst of all, the media
hacks and politicians tell us we have to trust him. That’s pretty close to case
closed right there.
Here’s the conundrum. If
Mueller is honest, he quits because of his massive conflict of interest, and we
lose an honest investigator. And if he doesn’t quit, we know the fix is in.