Siege of Vienna, 1683 (via Wikipedia)
According to Turkish historian Erhan Afyoncu, “Austria acts against Muslims almost every
day because of their subconscious fear of Turks. Austrians have not
forgotten the fear and their emperor’s escape in the Battle of Vienna in 1683.
When Turks were defeated in the Battle of Vienna, Europeans were so happy…”
This is true.
As such, a brief refresher on the
Siege of Vienna—the anniversary of which is today—is in order:
The largest Islamic army ever to invade
European territory—which is saying much considering that countless invasions
preceded it since the eighth century—came and surrounded Vienna, then the heart
of the Holy Roman Empire and longtime nemesis of Islam, around July 15, 1683.
"Some 200,000 Muslim combatants, under the
leadership of the Ottomans—the one state in nearly fourteen
centuries of Islamic history most dedicated to and founded on the principles of
jihad—invaded under the same rationale that so-called “radical” groups, such as
the Islamic State, cite to justify their jihad on “infidels.” Or, to
quote the leader of the Muslim expedition, Grand Vizier Kara Mustafa, because
Vienna was perceived as the head of the infidel snake, it needed to be laid low
so that “all the Christians would obey the Ottomans.”
This was no idle boast; sources describe this Mustafa
as “fanatically anti-Christian.” After capturing a Polish town in 1674 he
ordered all the Christian prisoners to be skinned alive and their stuffed hides
sent as trophies to Ottoman Sultan Muhammad IV.
Such supremacist hate was standard and on display during
the elaborate pre-jihad ceremony presaging the siege of Vienna. Then, the
sultan, “desiring him [Mustafa] to fight generously for the Mahometan faith,”
to quote a contemporary European source, placed “the standard of the
Prophet…into his hands for the extirpation of infidels, and the increase of
Muslemen.”
Once the massive Muslim army reached and surrounded the
walls of Vienna, Mustafa followed protocol. In 628, his prophet Muhammad had
sent an ultimatum to Emperor Heraclius: aslam taslam, “submit [to Islam] and have peace.”
Heraclius rejected the summons, jihad was declared against Christendom (as
enshrined in Koran 9:29), and in a few decades, two-thirds of the then
Christian world—including Spain, all of North Africa, Egypt, and Greater
Syria—were conquered.
Now, over a thousand years later, the same ultimatum of
submission to Islam or death had reached the heart of Europe. Although
the Viennese commander did not bother to respond to the summons, graffiti
inside the city—including “Muhammad, you dog, go home!”—seems to capture its
mood.
So it would be war. On the next day, Mustafa
unleashed all hell against the city’s walls; and for two months, the holed-up
and vastly outnumbered Viennese suffered plague, dysentery, starvation, and
many casualties—including women and children—in the name of jihad.
Then, on September 12, when the city had reached its
final extremity, and the Muslims were about to burst through, Vienna’s prayers
were answered. As an anonymous Englishman explained:
After a siege of sixty days, accompanied with a thousand
difficulties, sicknesses, want of provisions, and great effusion of blood,
after a million of cannon and musquet shot, bombs, granadoes, and all sorts of
fireworks, which has changed the face of the fairest and most flourishing city
in the world, disfigured and ruined [it] . . . heaven favorably heard the
prayers and tears of a cast down and mournful people.
The formidable king of Poland, John Sobieski,
had finally come at the head of 65,000 heavily-armored Poles, Austrians, and
Germans—all hot to avenge the beleaguered city.
Arguing that “It is not a city alone that we have to save, but the whole of
Christianity, of which the city of Vienna is the bulwark,” Sobieski led a
thunderous cavalry charge—history’s largest—against and totally routed the
Muslim besiegers.
Although a spectacular victory, the aftermath was gory: before
fleeing, the Muslims ritually slaughtered some 30,000 Christian captives
collected during their march to Vienna—raping the women beforehand. On
entering the relieved city, the liberators encountered piles of corpses,
sewage, and rubble everywhere.
It is this history of Islamic aggression—beginning in the
fourteenth century when Muslims first established a foothold in Eastern Europe
(Thrace), and into the twentieth century when the Ottoman sultanate finally
collapsed—that informs Eastern European views on Islam. As one modern
Pole, echoing the words of Sobieski, said, “A religious war between Christianity and Islam is
once again underway in Europe, just like in the past.”
Whereas Western nations cite lack of integration,
economic disparities, and grievances to explain away the exponential growth of
terrorism, violence, and sexual assaults that come with living alongside large,
resistant-to-assimilation Muslim populations, Eastern nations tend to see
only a continuity of hostility.
Note: The above account is excerpted
from Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam
and the West — a book that CAIR and its Islamist
allies did everything
they could to prevent the U.S.
Army War College from learning about.
