BY VICTORIA TAFT |P J Media
AP Photo/Mary Altaffer
A loose “network” of about 400 former investigators and
intelligence operatives from the FBI, CIA, NSA, and several other agencies are
investigating the 2020 election to determine if there was any election fraud,
according to an exclusive story in The Epoch Times.
A former CIA intelligence officer-turned private agent
for a “strategic planning, technologies and foreign and domestic” group under
President George H.W. Bush says he’s been a part of a network of such
investigators since 2014 but the group is increasing in size because of the
shady antics surrounding the 2020 presidential election results.
Robert Caron told The Epoch Times that the election fraud
was so in-your-face that he was impelled to activate the group to investigate
it.
“After numerous reports of irregularities in
the 2020 election, the investigation network expanded. Many have focused
on investigating the election, according to Caron, who said most are
volunteering, while some are getting paid for the inquiry. He said that as far
as he knows, the size of the network is “way over 400” and that each member of
the network sees obvious election
fraud based on their own observations.
“The fraud was so massive and so blatant, despite what
the mainstream media said, that we need to get this information out to the
public,” said Caron. “That’s why more and more people from the intelligence
community and law enforcement are coming out, which is unheard of.”
[…] Caron said that the network includes former
intelligence officers, analysts, operatives, military, law enforcement, and
judiciary from the FBI, CIA, Military Intelligence, DIA, and National Security
Agency (NSA), among others, as well as many former intelligence officers in
other countries.”
It’s unclear what the group can chase down at this point.
The deadline to approve the presidential contest is set for January 6.
A growing number of U.S. senators are calling for a
ten-day extension of the Electoral College count in a joint session of Congress
to complete an “audit” of the election. The Washington Post reports that Republican
Senators Ted Cruz (Texas), Ron Johnson (Wisc.), James Lankford (Okla.), Josh
Hawley (Mo.), and Senators-elect Cynthia Lummis (Wyo.), Roger Marshall (Kan.),
Tommy Tuberville (Kan.), and Bill Hagerty (Tenn.) will contest the Electoral
College vote certification.
The group issued a joint
statement on Saturday calling for the creation of a commission to
investigate the election results.
[A]n Electoral Commission, with full
investigatory and fact-finding authority, to conduct an emergency 10-day audit
of the election returns in the disputed states. Once completed, individual
states would evaluate the Commission’s findings and could convene a special
legislative session to certify a change in their vote, if needed.
“Accordingly, we intend to vote on January 6
to reject the electors from disputed states as not ‘regularly given’ and
‘lawfully certified’ (the statutory requisite), unless and until that emergency
10-day audit is completed.
The group further
states that such an audit is not unprecedented.
[T]here is long precedent of Democratic
Members of Congress raising objections to presidential election results, as
they did in 1969, 2001, 2005, and 2017. And, in both 1969 and 2005, a
Democratic Senator joined with a Democratic House Member in forcing votes in
both houses on whether to accept the presidential electors being challenged.
“The most direct precedent on this question
arose in 1877, following serious allegations of fraud and illegal conduct in
the Hayes-Tilden presidential race. Specifically, the elections in three
states-Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina-were alleged to have been
conducted illegally.
“In 1877, Congress did not ignore those
allegations, nor did the media simply dismiss those raising them as radicals
trying to undermine democracy. Instead, Congress appointed an Electoral
Commission-consisting of five Senators, five House Members, and five Supreme
Court Justices-to consider and resolve the disputed returns.
Vice President Mike Pence, who presides over the joint
session, seemed willing to entertain the group’s request. He issued a statement saying that he “welcomed the
efforts of members of the House and Senate to use the authority they have under
the law to raise objections and bring forward evidence before the Congress and
the American people on January 6th.”
Caron says the group of 400-plus intelligence officials
began investigating the results of elections when the intelligence community
was shocked when President Obama did not act “properly on intelligence” after
the 2016 election, according to then-Defense Intelligence Agency chief General
Michael Flynn, who was later fired after criticizing his boss. Flynn was later spied on by Obama administration officials in order to
get the three-star general thrown out from his job as President Donald Trump’s
National Security Adviser. It worked. The Crossfire Hurricane investigation,
otherwise known as the Russia hoax, ended in infamy.
Since then, the group has also seen other instances where
intelligence wasn’t properly acted upon.
“President Obama was not acting properly on intelligence
that he received concerning Benghazi,” Caron said, referring to an attack of
U.S. government facilities in Benghazi, Libya, that resulted in the deaths of
several U.S. officials. He said he believes it was then that a lot of people
from the intelligence community got together and started recruiting people to
join the network.
The mainstream media continues to pretend that there’s
nothing hinky with the election results or myriad reports of voter fraud.
It will be interesting to see if they pick up this story about the 400-plus
intel pros looking into the election. If you’ll recall, a pre-election letter
signed by 50 Obama-era intelligence community folks was issued in response to
the Hunter Biden laptop, Ukraine, and The Big Guy story. The same people who
said that Donald Trump was a Russian secret agent alleged that the laptop story
could possibly, perhaps, maybe be
Russian disinformation. The media hung their hats on that gauzy characterization
to boycott the explosive story about Joe Biden’s son and Biden’s high-stakes
role as the family rainmaker. And only after the election did we find out that
the younger Biden was indeed under investigation.
If these intelligence community spooks have any intel
they’d better get the news out fast. Time’s a-wasting.
Victoria Taft is the host of “The Adult in the
Room Podcast With Victoria Taft” where you can hear her
series on “Antifa Versus Mike Strickland.” Find it here. Follow her
on Facebook, Twitter, Parler, MeWe, Minds @VictoriaTaft
________________
Related
Articles
Democrats
Have Objected to Electoral Vote Certification for the Last Three GOP Presidents
5
Reasons Why You’re Not Crazy to Question the Election Results
Tech
Expert Shocks GA Election Fraud Hearing With News He ‘Got Into’ Voting System
With WiFi
