By Tiffany Layne | The Kevin Jackson Network
Once again the facts destroy the fiction.
More anvils are falling on the heads of the Democrat
Party, as the Manhattan DA ended one of many Trump-directed witch hunts. So
what’s the next move against the iconic orange man?
Apparently, the investigation is over. As it should have
been months ago. Actually, it never should have started. But Democrats were
holding out hope that they’d finally catch Trump doing something. Anything they
could use against him.
DA Alvin Bragg came into office after the investigation
commenced. And he promised to follow the facts. Of course, we were confident
that facts would clear Trump. Still, it comes as a bit of a surprise that Bragg
closed the book and decided not to press any charges. Because when it comes to
Donald Trump, there are a lot of power players that want to keep him far away
from public office. Those power players enlist Democrats and Republicans alike
to further their cause. So when truth prevails, it is an absolute victory for
conservatives.
Like most victories, there were definite casualties. In
fact, two top investigators stepped down over Trump’s vindication.
Fox News elaborates:
Mark
Pomerantz and Carey Dunne, who had been leading the investigation under former
DA Cyrus Vance, submitted their resignations last month, after Bragg began
raising doubts about pursuing a case against Trump.
“You
have reached the decision not to go forward with the grand jury presentation
and not to seek criminal charges at the present time,” Pomerantz wrote in his
resignation letter, first reported by the New York Times. “The investigation
has been suspended indefinitely.”
“Of
course, that is your decision to make,” Pomerantz wrote to Bragg. “I do not
question your authority to make it, and I accept that you have made it
sincerely.”
However,
Pomerantz said that “a decision made in good faith may nevertheless be wrong.”
“I
believe that your decision not to prosecute Donald Trump now, and on the
existing record, is misguided and completely contrary to the public interest,”
Pomerantz wrote. “I therefore cannot continue in my current position.”
Pomerantz
wrote that he believed Trump was “guilty of numerous felony violations” and
said it would be a “grave failure of justice not to prosecute him.”
Pomerantz
and Dunne had previously agreed to stay on in the district attorney’s office
after Vance’s term expired in January and Bragg took the helm.
At
the time, Bragg said he was getting up to speed on the Trump investigation and
vowed to “follow the facts.”
“It’s
a matter that’s personally, as you would imagine, on my radar screen and that
I’m mindful of and paying attention to,” Bragg said.
But
while Pomerantz and his team were prepared to move forward with charges against
Trump, Bragg was not.
Despite
that decision, Pomerantz, in his resignation letter, claimed his team that had
been investigating Trump “harbors no doubt about whether he committed crimes—he
did.”
But did he? Really?
Is anyone else having flashbacks here? Because I remember
when Rachel
Maddow was scooped by President Trump a few years ago. She
promised viewers (all ten of them) that she had the goods on Donald Trump.
For the entire day, MSNBC played clips of Maddow waving
around Trump’s 2005 tax return. Maddow’s intent was to prove that Trump didn’t
pay his taxes.
This became a Leftist mantra, “Trump never paid taxes.”
Interestingly, Trump never bothered to acknowledge the accusation. Thus Maddow
joined the witch hunt.
As it turns out, despite the ability to not pay taxes due
to earlier losses, Donald Trump had paid taxes. A lot of taxes. $38 MILLION in
taxes.
Allow me to spare you the details, except to say that
Maddow spent almost the entire show stalling. She’d been scooped. Thus, her
narrative was blown.
If only there had been a way to tie Trump to RUSSIA!
Ironically, Maddow didn’t even acknowledge that Trump
paid $38 million in taxes. Nor did she explain that he could have avoided the
tax burden due to his $916 million loss in 1995, an exemption he could use for
up to 18 years.
The story here isn’t all that different. Trump did the
opposite of what leftists accused him of doing.
Back to Fox:
[A]
source familiar with the investigation pointed Fox News Digital, specifically,
to Trump’s “Statement of Financial Condition,” which reports an entity’s
assets, liabilities and abilities to raise and use funds.
The
source told Fox News Digital that Trump did not inflate his financial
statements, as prosecutors had anticipated, but instead, undervalued his
assets.
Re-read that. Trump “undervalued” his assets.
In other words, he made himself look worse, not better.
The
source also told Fox News that Trump never defaulted on payments to banks, and
said his statement of financial condition included “caveats” which “refuted”
claims by the DA’s office.
One
source familiar with the investigation claimed the case against Trump was
political and fueled by the former president’s political enemies, and told Fox
News that Pomerantz “shouldn’t have been in the DA’s office in the first
place.”
Before
joining Vance’s office, Pomerantz was of counsel at New York law firm Paul,
Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison. He took leave from the firm last year
to join Vance’s office to investigate Trump’s financial dealings.
Senate
Majority Leader Chuck Schumer’s brother, Robert Schumer, is a partner at the
firm. Pomerantz donated to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign.
“It
is a great tribute to the system that Alvin Bragg came in and stopped the
unfairness against Trump,” a source close to the investigation told Fox News.
“Bragg and his team did the legally and morally correct thing, and they didn’t
go the typical political route.”
The
source added that Bragg and his team “realized they had no case, they stopped
it.”
Let’s break it down here. Bragg took over the DA’s
office, and he was willing to face the facts. He asked for provable information
against Donald Trump. No one could ante up. Case closed. As it should be here
in the United States of America. It’s a little thing we like to call “innocent,
until PROVEN guilty.”
https://theblacksphere.net/2022/03/democrats-facing-fallout-trump-not-guilty/
____________________
RELATED
ARTICLE
Trump Goes Nuclear: Files Charges Against
Clinton, et al
By Kevin Jackson | The Kevin Jackson Network
Donald
Trump just went nuclear. He filed
charges against Hillary Clinton, et al.
Trump
v. Clinton. (Filed Mar. 24, 2022).
COMPLAINT, Case No. 2:22-cv-14102-XXXX, 108 pgs.
Below is a list of plaintiffs:
HILLARY R. CLINTON, HFACC, INC., DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL
COMMITTEE, DNC SERVICES CORPORATION, PERKINS COIE, LLC, MICHAEL SUSSMANN, MARC
ELIAS, DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, CHARLES HALLIDAY DOLAN, JR., JAKE SULLIVAN,
JOHN PODESTA, ROBERT E. MOOK, PHILLIPE REINES, FUSION GPS, GLENN SIMPSON, PETER
FRITSCH, NELLIE OHR, BRUCE OHR, ORBIS BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE, LTD., CHRISTOPHER
STEELE, IGOR DANCHENKO, NEUSTAR, INC., RODNEY JOFFE, JAMES COMEY, PETER STRZOK,
LISA PAGE, KEVIN CLINESMITH, ANDREW MCCABE, JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10 (said names
being fictious and unknown persons), and ABC CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH 10 (said
names being fictitious and unknown entities),
Here is a link to
the document:
Trump may do what feckless AG
Barr didn’t accomplish. And he might zip past John Durham, who certainly took
his sweet time.
What are the ramifications?
I love how Trump’s legal team
framed the argument:
1. In the run-up to the 2016
Presidential Election, Hillary Clinton and her cohorts orchestrated an
unthinkable plot – one that shocks the conscience and is an affront to this
nation’s democracy. Acting in concert, the Defendants maliciously conspired to
weave a false narrative that their Republican opponent, Donald J. Trump, was
colluding with a hostile foreign sovereignty.
The actions taken in
furtherance of their scheme—falsifying evidence, deceiving law enforcement, and
exploiting access to highly-sensitive data sources – are so outrageous,
subversive and incendiary that even the events of Watergate pale in comparison.
2. Under the guise of
‘opposition research,’ ‘data analytics,’ and other political stratagems, the
Defendants nefariously sought to sway the public’s trust. They worked together
with a single, self-serving purpose: to vilify Donald J. Trump. Indeed, their
far-reaching conspiracy was designed to cripple Trump’s bid for presidency by fabricating
a scandal that would be used to trigger an unfounded federal investigation and
ignite a media frenzy.
3. The scheme was conceived,
coordinated and carried out by top-level officials at the Clinton Campaign and
the DNC—including ‘the candidate’ herself—who attempted to shield her
involvement behind a wall of third parties.
The complaint goes on to
describe in depth what Clinton, et al did to thwart Trump.
What’s next?
Needless to say, this lawsuit
will be in the media for a bit. I can only suspect that Trump’s legal team has
done it due diligence so that this case is foolproof.
If I were a betting man, I’d
bet that Trump is only beginning with lawsuits. I think Dominion might get
their legal team on notice that Trump is now on the warpath.
And for the anti-Trump
naysayers, what will you say when Trump wins? He already has one trophy in the
case with Stormy Daniels head on it.
https://theblacksphere.net/2022/03/trump-goes-nuclear-files-charges-against-clinton-et-al/
