By Walter E. Williams
Much is made about observed differences between sexes and
among races.
The nation's academic and legal elite try to sell us on the notion
that men and women and people of all races should be proportionally represented
in socio-economic characteristics.
They make statements such as "Though
African Americans and Hispanics make up approximately 32 percent of the US
population, they (constituted) 56 percent of all incarcerated people in
2015" and "20 percent of Congress is women. Only 5 percent of CEOs
are."
These differences are frequently referred to as
disparities. Legal professionals, judges, politicians, academics and others
often operate under the assumption that we are all equal.
Therefore,
inequalities and disparities are seen as probative of injustice. Thus,
government must intervene, find the cause and engineer a policy or law to
eliminate the injustice. Such a vision borders on lunacy.
There's no evidence
anywhere or at any time in human history that shows that but for some kind of
social injustice, people would be proportionally represented across a range of
socio-economic attributes by race and sex.
Indeed, if there is a dominant feature of mankind, it's
that we differ significantly over a host of socio-economic characteristics by
race, sex, ethnicity and nationality.
The differences have little or nothing to
do with any sort of social injustice or unfair treatment.
Let's examine some
racial, ethnic and sex disparities with an eye toward identifying the injustice
involved. We might also ponder what kind of policy recommendation is necessary
to correct the disparity.
Jews constitute no more than 3 percent of the U.S.
population but are 35 percent of American Nobel Prize winners.
As of 2017,
Nobel Prizes had been awarded to 902 individuals worldwide. Though Jews are
less than 2 percent of the world's population, 203, or 22.5 percent, of the
Nobel Prizes were awarded to Jews.
Proportionality would have created 18 Jewish
Nobel laureates instead of an "unfair" 203. What should Congress and
the United Nations do to "correct" such a disparity?
Should the Nobel
committees be charged with racism?
Jews are not the only people taking more than their
"fair share" of things.
Blacks are 13 percent of the U.S. population
but, in some seasons, have been as high as 84 percent of NBA players.
Compounding that "injustice," blacks are the highest-paid basketball
players and win nearly all of the MVP prizes.
Blacks are also guilty of taking
67 percent, an "unfair" share, of professional football jobs.
Blacks
are in the top salary category in every offensive and defensive position except
quarterback.
But let's not lull ourselves into complacency. How often do you
see a black NFL kicker or punter?
Laotian, Samoan and Vietnamese women have the highest
cervical cancer rates in the United States.
The Pima Indians of Arizona have
the highest reported prevalence of diabetes of any population in the world.
Tay-Sachs disease favors Ashkenazi Jews.
Cystic fibrosis haunts white people.
Blacks of West African ethnic origin have the highest incidence of sickle cell
anemia.
The prevalence of prostate cancer is lower in men of South Asian
ethnicity than in the general population.
Black American men have the highest
prostate cancer rates of any racial or ethnic group in the United States.
Black
males are also 30 percent likelier to die from heart disease than white men.
There are some highly fatal sex disparities.
An
Australian study found that sharks are nine times likelier to attack and kill
men than they are women.
Another disturbing sex disparity is that despite the
fact that men are 50 percent of the U.S. population and so are women, men are
struck by lightning six times as often as women. Of those killed by lightning,
82 percent are men.
There are loads of other disparities based upon physical
characteristics, but it would take a fool to believe that we are all equal and
any difference between us is a result of some kind of social injustice that
begs for a societal remedy.
The only kind of equality consistent with liberty
is equality before the law -- which doesn't require that people be in fact
equal.
