Photo: Harvard University Library
The Humanitarian Hoax is a deliberate and deceitful
tactic of presenting a destructive policy as altruistic. The humanitarian
huckster presents himself as a compassionate advocate when in fact he is the
disguised enemy.
The humanitarian hoax of black-only college graduation
ceremonies is a classic example of destruction disguised as altruism. Let’s
examine how resegregation has become fashionable.
Martin Luther King Jr. was the icon of the civil rights
movement in the United States from 1955 until his assassination in 1968. Dr.
King advocated nonviolence and civil disobedience similar to Gandi’s nonviolent
activism.
At the legendary 1963 March on Washington Dr. King delivered his
famous “I have a dream” speech which exhorted Americans to judge each other by
the content of their character, not the color of their skin. His impassioned
speech facilitated the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which outlawed
discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
The Civil Rights Act, signed into law by President Lyndon
Johnson, is considered the most comprehensive civil rights legislation since
Congress passed the 13th Amendment to the Constitution that abolished slavery
in 1865. What happened?
[Editor’s
Note: Click here to read expanded information about the comprehensive civil
rights legislation that was passed in the late 1800s but were later overturned
by Democrats when they took over Congress in 1892 and enacted the Civil Rights
Repeal Act of 1894.]
The 13th Amendment and the Civil Rights Act were
legislative remedies designed to achieve the Constitutional principle that all
men are created equal. Black Americans, white Americans, brown Americans, red
Americans, and yellow Americans – one united American family indivisible by
color. Being American is the foundation and common denominator of equality.
In a shocking 5.16.19 article written by Drew Van Voorhis, he reports the
findings of the National Association of Scholars (NAS) study of
Neo-Segregation, the voluntary racial segregation of students. WHAT??
Neo-Segregation is the consequence of social scientists
eliminating the merit system in favor of racial quotas. Racial quotas in the
60s resulted in elite universities like Yale, admitting under-qualified minority
students who were doomed to fail. Over a third of the students dropped out, and
those who remained were bitter and angry.
It is important to remember that had an equal number of
under-qualified white students been admitted they would have suffered the same
failure rate. This was always a qualification issue and not a racial issue even
though it was race-based.
Instead of learning from the failure rates and emotional
misery that failure inevitable brings, the social scientists doubled down and
provided remedial classes for under-qualified students in another ill-advised
attempt to level the playing field.
The result, according to the NAS study, was that students
turned to each other for emotional support and found inspiration in black
nationalism. Radical and militant black groups on campus offered a new
separatist ethic that rejected integration in favor of identity politics.
The NAS report states:
“On campus after campus, black separatists won
concessions from administrators who were afraid of further alienating blacks.
The pattern of college administrators rolling over to black separatists demands
came to dominate much of American higher education.
The old integrationist
ideal has been sacrificed almost entirely. Instead of offering opportunities for
students to mix freely with students of dissimilar backgrounds, colleges
promote ethnic enclaves, stoke racial resentment, and build organizational
structures on the basis of group grievance.”
More that 76 of the 173 universities studied by the
National Association of Scholars, a whopping 44%, host black-only graduation
ceremonies.
Even Harvard University hosted its first black-only graduation
ceremony in 2017.
What would possess university administrators to surrender
to black separatists demands and implement black-only study lounges, black-only
clubs, black-only housing, black-only classes, black-only scholarships,
black-only student associations, and black-only graduation ceremonies? Why has
segregation become desirable again?
If you want to know the motive look at the result. Race
based distinctions foment racial divisiveness and are antithetical to racial
harmony. Leftism preaches unity but its policies foment racial tension. Can
anyone imagine if these same universities held white-only graduation ceremonies
or had white-only study lounges and housing?
Reverse discrimination is the wrong answer to the right
problem, and is as egregious as the original discrimination. Harvard
disingenuously describes its segregated graduation ceremony in lofty terms as
being, “designed to celebrate their unique struggles and achievements at the
elite institution that has been grappling with its historical ties to slavery.”
REALLY?
If the nation’s goal is racial inclusion and harmony,
then graduation ceremonies would be expected to celebrate the shared value of
student achievement regardless of the color of their skin.
Graduations would
honor white students, black students, Asian students, Indian students, and
Latino students experiencing student life together. It would recognize the
social value of studying together, and the commonality of learning together,
achieving together, and graduating together.
Young children on playgrounds naturally fulfill Martin
Luther King’s dream effortlessly because they naturally focus on character and
not on race. Students at leftist colleges unnaturally focus on race instead of
character. What happened?
Why did resegregation become fashionable? Because the
left realized that racism is a useful and powerful political tool to create
divisiveness and social chaos in America.
Race-based policies are not only an admissions debacle,
they are a threat to the productivity of America. Lowering academic standards
and course requirements collapses the integrity of universities and results in
many useless degrees. Caps and gowns become costumes of competence that do not
reflect actual competence.
Under-qualified students who cannot compete in the
classroom cannot compete in the workplace either. This creates more anger,
bitterness and simultaneously makes America less productive. It is the merit
system that drives the engine of a fair, successful, competent, independent,
productive America. In the real world, competence is the mother of self-esteem.
It is the acquisition of skills and competence that
actually make students proud of themselves – not the social engineering of
leftist sociologists disingenuously insisting that performance, achievement,
and merit are oppressive constructs of the white man. The blame game is a
destructive, regressive, and deceitful strategy calculated to foment racial
discord because the leftist leadership understands that anger fuels the
revolution.
Social chaos is the prerequisite for seismic social
change. The regressive left is inciting divisiveness, discord, and violence to
make America ungovernable in its quest to make America socialist. Leftism has a
lot of help these days from Islamists and globalists who have common cause to
join the “resistance” and destroy America from within.
Neo-Segregation is a deliberate and alarming return to
the fractious, divisive, hateful, era of racial conflict before Martin Luther
King.
The racism and black separatism that has torn college
campuses apart is now embraced by New York public schools K-12.
Consider the “white-supremacy culture” training program
for school administrators being promoted by New York City Department of
Education and Schools, Chancellor Richard Carranza.
His shockingly racist slide
show presentation is derived from “Dismantling Racism: A Workbook for Social
Change Groups” by Kenneth Jones and Tema Okun.
These are the dirty dozen hallmarks of “white-supremacy
culture” that school administrators are directed to avoid:
1. Perfectionism
2. Sense of Urgency
3. Defensiveness
4. Quantity over Quality
5. Worship of the Written Word
6. Only one right way
7. Paternalism
8. Either/or thinking
9. Power Hoarding
10. Fear of Open Conflict
11. Individualism
12. Progress is Bigger, More
13. Objectivit
14. Right to Comfort
2. Sense of Urgency
3. Defensiveness
4. Quantity over Quality
5. Worship of the Written Word
6. Only one right way
7. Paternalism
8. Either/or thinking
9. Power Hoarding
10. Fear of Open Conflict
11. Individualism
12. Progress is Bigger, More
13. Objectivit
14. Right to Comfort
Chancellor Carranza’s openly race-based perspective is
explosive. His 14-point mandatory training program assumes “implicit bias” and “white privilege.” His directive creates
reverse discrimination and a doctrine of “toxic whiteness.”
Instead of embracing Martin Luther King,
Chancellor Carranza has chosen civil rights activist Malcolm X to emulate.
Malcolm X, a black separatist and supremacist, advocated against racial
integration. Instead of supporting an American family of equality, integration,
and equal opportunity, Malcolm X indicted the white community and blamed
“whitey” for the failures in the black community.
In a letter addressed to Dr. King on July 31, 1963, Malcolm
X describes the power of racial tensions saying, “A racial explosion is more
destructive than a nuclear explosion.” Malcolm X, minister of Muhammad’s New
York Mosque at the time, sarcastically acknowledged the “minor” differences
between his own approach and that of Dr. King.
Failed university policies of racial divisiveness are
being repeated in New York schools by Chancellor Carranza, and are supported by
his leftist boss Mayor Bill de Blasio. De Blasio, a radical
socialist/communist, understands the long game of social chaos that racial
divisiveness necessarily generates.
Race-based policies will fail in K-12 just as they failed
in universities. Instead of Dr. King’s dream of harmony and respect, Carranza’s
racial policies encourage the nightmare of racial divisiveness and anarchy.
America is based on equal opportunity – not equal outcome.
Competence is the mother of self-esteem. If administrators want to develop
students who become citizens with self-esteem, they must abandon the failed
strategy of artificially leveling the playing field and insist upon equal
opportunity for all students white, black, brown, or yellow.
Only then will
America reunite and judge each other by the content of character and not the
color of our skin.
Resegregation is not a humanitarian effort that respects
the black experience. It is a sinister exploitation of black students that
fuels their anger and makes them useful to the revolution. Social chaos is the
prelude to tyranny. The humanitarian hoax of black-only college graduations is
the deeply dividing intentional fomenting of racism designed to tear America
apart and make it ungovernable.
Esegregation is the humanitarian hoax designed to ignite
racial tensions that will trigger the nuclear explosion of anarchy that Malcolm
X predicted. Anarchy is the leftist strategy for seismic social change designed
to make America socialist – the necessary precursor to one world government.
Game over.
