Commentary by Frances Rice
As proposed by Senator Ted Cruz and supported by other members of Congress, concerned citizens of this county believe it is incumbent upon Congress to appoint a Voter Fraud Commission to investigate the allegations of 2020 election voter fraud in the battleground states
Below is an article by Rick Hayes that capsulizes the extent of the 2020 election voter fraud.
Further below is an article by Physicist John Droz, Jr. that contains links to several investigative reports done by an informal coalition of some 10,000 individuals, and about 700 of them are PhDs or possess other expertise credentials. Also included in this article are links to multiple reports conducted by other voter fraud investigators.
By Rick Hayes
Evidence and the refuting of evidence must be based on specific and verifiable facts. Specific and verifiable are the two key components to look for when judging if a statement is based on a point or just an opinion.
"The election was stolen." "The election was not stolen." are two good examples of factless opinions. Both statements are worthless as far as evidence or considering the truth of the matter.Ask yourself the following question.
If the 2020 presidential election had evidence of fraud, shouldn't the evidence be heard? Can anyone with an ounce of integrity answer no? What does ignoring the evidence say about justice, fairness, and integrity? Not just regarding this election but any situation in opposition to particular desires?
So, specific and verifiable evidence is the acid test to cut through the fog and get to the truth.Nevada's voting records for the 2020 Presidential election show that 42 thousand people voted more than once, 19 thousand people who voted did not live in Nevada, 8 thousand people who voted did not have a current address, and 4 thousand non-citizens voted. President Trump's legal team has publically made the above statements. Are they true, or are they a bunch of lies? If they were lies, wouldn't it be the quickest way to end Trump's Presidential election challenges by proving them as lies?
One thing is for sure; they would be considered as evidence in any honest court in the country. They are statements based on public and published information that is easily found and verifiable. And yet, the media continues to say that the President has no evidence.
Let's look at affidavits. An affidavit is a sworn statement of fact. All courts treat affidavits as a written version of a verbal swearing under oath. Witnesses who sign an affidavit that contains false information are subject to the crime of perjury just as they would if they gave their testimony in open court.
There are 1,100 sworn, signed affidavits, all of which are considered by U.S. courts to be evidence, alleging that the 2020 Presidential election was conducted fraudulently. And yet, the media continues to say that the President has not presented any evidence. Why does the media keep repeating what is so clearly a false statement?
Video proof is compelling and is accepted as evidence by any court in The United States. Jackie Pick, an attorney with the Trump campaign, presented a two-minute long video to the Senate Judiciary subcommittee as evidence alleging election fraud in Georgia. The video contained footage of ballot counting at the State Farm Arena in Fulton County in Georgia on November 3rd and 4th.
The video shows ballot counting from several camera angles. The footage revealed four large, black bins filled with ballots being taken out from under a large blanketed table. The votes from the containers are seen being counted using the available machines for approximately two hours, absent of any media or poll watchers, which are required by Georgia election law.
Why were ballots under the table, and why were they taken out immediately after poll watchers were instructed to exit the building? How many times have you heard the media say no evidence of fraud in the 2020 Presidential election exists? Do you agree that the above election data, affidavits, and video are considered evidence? If not, why are these items considered evidence in all other courts?
Would you agree that the most reliable results occur when all information is known? Would you agree that the silencing or restraining of data can create less than reliable results? And most importantly, why would any honest person suppress information?
Americans need to come together and move the country forward under a Trump or a Biden administration. And the only way that will ever occur is if all of the facts and evidence is allowed to be presented and heard in an open and publically observed court proceeding.
REPORT: 2020 Presidential Election Startling Vote Spikes
By John Droz, Jr.
Although some of these spikes (aka dumps) could have a legitimate explanation, considering the rest of the evidence that has now been exposed, it’s likely that these are yet other examples of malfeasance by bad actors.
Here are links to reports prepared by our team:
The Michigan Report,
The Claudia Tenney Report (NY22),
Below are links to reports by other voter fraud investigators:
1 - The Nevada Report by attorney Jesse Binnall.
2 - The Antrim Michigan (Dominion) Report done by Russ Ramsland.
3 - The Immaculate Deception Report by Peter Navarro.
4 - A Judicial Watch Study that concluded that 353 US counties have more registered voters than people eligible to vote.
5 - A compendium of actions and claims.
6 - A collection of evidence.
7 - Yet another compilation of evidence.
8 – The 2020 archives of my Newsletter, where I reference over a hundred articles and reports about the 2020 election mess. They include fascinating ones like this for which there has never been a resolution.
Here is a link to my post-Electoral College commentary: When Will the Fat Lady Sing?